2 March, 2005
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 20F65, (20F67.20E08,57M07).
Limit groups for relatively hyperbolic groups, II: Makanin-Razborov diagrams
Daniel Groves
Daniel Groves, Department of Mathematics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA E-mail address : groves@caltech.edu
-
Abstract.
Let
be a torsion-free group which is hyperbolic relative to a collection of free abeian subgroups. We construct Makanin-Razborov diagrams for
. We also prove that every system of equations over
is equivalent to a finite subsystem, and a number of structural results about
-limit groups.
1 Introduction
This paper is a continuation of [17] . Throughout this paper,
will denote a torsion-free group which is hyperbolic relative to a collection of free abelian subgroups. For an arbitrary finitely generated group
, we wish to understand the set
of all homomorphisms from
to
.
In [17] we considered a sequence of homomorphisms
and extracted a limiting
-action on a suitable asymptotic cone, and then extracted an
-tree with a nontrivial
-action. This
-tree allows much information to be obtained. In particular, in case
, we studied
and also proved that
is Hopfian. In this paper, we continue this study, in case
is an arbitrary finitely generated group.
In particular, we construct a Makanin-Razborov diagram for
, which gives a parametrisation of
(see Section 6 below). We build on our work from [17] , which in turn builds on our previous work of [15] and [16] . The strategy is to follow [27,
§
1
] , though there are extra technical difficulties to deal with.
To a system of equations
over
in finitely many variables there is naturally associated a finitely generated group
, with generators the variables in
, and relations the equations. The solutions to
in
are in bijection with the elements of
. Thus, Makanin-Razborov diagrams give a description of the set of solutions to a given system of equations over
. For free groups, building on the work of Makanin and Razborov, Makanin-Razborov diagrams were constructed by Kharlampovich and Miasnikov [20] , and also by Sela [26] . For torsion-free hyperbolic groups, Makanin-Razborov diagrams were constructed by Sela [27] , and it is Sela's approach that we follow here. Alibegović [2] constructed Makanin-Razborov diagrams for limit groups.
Limit groups are hyperbolic relative to their maximal non-cyclic abelian subgroups (see [8] and [1] ). Limits groups are also torsion-free.
Therefore, the main result of this paper (the construction of Makanin-Razborov diagrams) generalises the main result of [2] . Alibegović has another approach to the construction of Makanin-Razborov diagrams for these relatively hyperbolic groups (see [2,Remark3.7] ).
The main results of this paper are the following:
Theorem 5.9 Suppose that
is a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics, and that
is a finitely generated group.
Then
is a
-limit group if and only if
is fully residually
.
Proposition 5.10 Suppose that
is a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics. Then there are only countably many
-limit groups.
Definition 5.14 A group
is a called equationally Noetherian if every system of equations over
in finitely many variables is equivalent to a finite subsystem.
Theorem 5.15 Let
be a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics. Then
is equationally Noetherian. Theorem 6.4 Let
be a finitely generated group and
a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics. Associated to
is a Makanin-Razborov diagram, with vertices
and
-limit quotients of
, and edges a canonical quotient map. Any homomorphism
can be given by compositions of modular automorphisms of the
-limit groups in the diagram with the canonical maps from
-limit groups into their maximal proper shortening quotients, and finally with either embeddings of a
-limit group in the diagram into
, or general homomorphisms of the terminal free groups that appear in the diagram into
.
See Sections 3 , 4 , 5 and 6 for definitions and discussion of the terminology in Theorem 6.4 above. The output of Theorem 6.4 is a parametrisation of
for an aribtrary finitely generated group
, in terms of successive proper quotients of
(with a fixed canonical quotient), modular automorphisms, embeddings into
, and homomorphisms from a free group to
. Note that for a fixed finitely generated free group
of rank
, the set
can be naturally parametrised by
, by the universal property of free groups.
Sela [28,I.8] asked whether Theorems 5.15 and 6.4 hold in the context of CAT
groups with isolated flats. We believe that relatively hyperbolic groups with abelian parabolics are a natural setting for these questions.
An outline of this paper is as follows. In Section 2 we recall the definition of relatively hyperbolic groups, and recall the construction of limiting
-trees from [15] and [17] , as well as other useful results. In Section 3 we improve upon our version of Sela's shortening argument from [16] and [17] to deal with arbitrary sequences of homomorphisms
where
is an arbitrary finitely generated group. In Section 4 we recall Sela's construction of shortening quotients from [26] , and adapt this construction to our setting. In Section 5 we prove Theorem 5.2 , one of the main technical results of this paper. We also prove Theorems 5.10 , 5.15 , and a number of structural results about
-limit groups. Finally in Section 6 we construct Makanin-Razborov diagrams over
.
In the future work [18] , we will continue to study the elementary theory of torsion-free relatively hyperbolic groups with free abelian parabolic subgroups.
Acknowledgement. I would like to thank Zlil Sela for providing me with the proof of [27,Proposition1.21] , which is repeated in the proof of Proposition 5.13 in this paper.
2 Preliminaries
2.1 Relatively hyperbolic groups
Relatively hyperbolic groups were first defined by Gromov in his seminal paper on hyperbolic groups [14] . Another definition was given by Farb [13] , and further definitions given by Bowditch [6] . These definitions are all equivalent (see [7] and [29] ). Recently there has been a large amount of interest in these groups (see [1, 7, 9, 10, 11, 21, 30] , among others).
The definition we give here is due to Bowditch [6] .
Definition 2.1.
A group
with a family
of finitely generated subgroups is called hyperbolic relative to
if
acts on a
-hyperbolic graph
with finite quotient and finite edge stabilisers, where the stabilisers of infinite valence vertices are the elements of
, so that
has only finitely many orbits of simple loops of length
for each positive integer
.
The groups in
are called parabolic subgroups of
.
In this paper we will be exclusively interested in relatively hyperbolic groups which are torsion-free and have abelian parabolic subgroups.
2.2 The limiting
-tree
In this subsection we recall a construction from [17] (see also [15] for more details). Suppose that
is a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolic subgroups. In [17] , we constructed a space
on which
acts properly and cocompactly by isometries. For each parabolic subgroup
(of rank
, say) there is in
an isometrically embedded copy of
, with the Euclidean metric, so that the action of
leaves this Euclidean space invariant and this
-action is proper and cocompact with quotient the
-torus.
Suppose now that
is a finitely generated group, and that
is a sequence of homomorphisms, and suppose that the
do not differ only by post-composition with an inner automorphism of
.
By considering the induced actions of
on
, and passing to a limit, we extract an isometric action of
on the asymptotic cone
of
such that this action has no global fixed point. There is a separable
-invariant subset
, and by passing to a subsequence
of
we may assume that the (appropriately scaled) actions of
on
converge in the Gromov-Hausdorff topology to the
-action on
.
The space
is a tree-graded metric space, in the terminology of Druţ u and Sapir [10] . Informally, this means that there is a collection of `pieces' (in this case finite dimensional Euclidean spaces), and otherwise the space is `tree-like' (see [10] for the precise definition and many properties of tree-graded metric spaces). By carefully choosing lines in the `pieces', and projecting, an
-tree
is extracted from
. This tree
comes equipped with an isometric
-action with no global fixed points and the kernel of the
-action on
is the same as the kernel of the
-action on
. For more details on this entire construction, see [17] and [15] .
Definition 2.2.
Suppose that
is a sequence of homomorphisms. The stable kernel of
, denoted
, is the set of all
so that
for all but finitely many
.
The following theorem recalls some of the properties of the
-action on the
-tree
.
Theorem 2.3 (cf. Theorem 4.4, [15] and Theorem 6.4, [17] ).
Suppose that
is a torsion-free group that is hyperbolic relative to a collection of free abelian subgroups and that
is a finitely generated group. Let
be a sequence of pairwise non-conjugate homomorphisms. There is a subsequence
of
and an action of
on an
-tree
so that if
is the kernel of the action of
on
and
then
-
(1)
The stabiliser in
of any nondegenerate segment in
is free abelian;
-
(2)
If
is isometric to a real line then
is free abelian, and for all but finitely
the group
is free abelian;
-
(3)
If
stabilises a tripod in
then
;
-
(4)
Let
be non-degenerate segments in
, and assume that
is nontrivial. Then
In particular, the action of
on
is stable; and
-
(5)
is torsion-free.
Thus
is isometric to a line if and only if
is abelian. If
is not abelian then
.
We now recall the definition of
-limit groups. There are many ways of defining
-limit groups. We choose a geometric definition using the above construction.
Definition 2.4 (cf. Definition 1.11, [27] , Definition 1.2, [17] ).
A strict
-limit group is a quotient
where
is a finitely generated group, and
is the kernel of the action of
on
, where
is the
-tree arising from a sequence of non-conjugate homomorphisms
as described above.
A
-limit group is a group which is either a strict
-limit group or a finitely generated subgroup of
.
Remark 2.5.
There are finitely generated subgroups of torsion-free hyperbolic groups which are not finitely presented (see, for example, [
22]
). Therefore, when
is a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with free abelian parabolic subgroups, a
-limit group need not be finitely presented. This presents substantial complications (many of which are already dealt with by Sela in [
27]
), some of which are solved by the application of Theorem 5.7 below.
2.3 Acylindrical accessibility and JSJ decompositions
In [24] , Sela studied acylindrical graph of groups decomposition, and proved an accessibility theorem for
-acylindrical splittings. Unlike other accessibility results such as [12] and [3] , Sela's result holds for finitely generated groups, rather than just for finitely presented groups.
We can apply acylindrical accessibility to our limiting construction because (i) tripod stabilisers are trivial; and (ii) maximal abelian subgroups of
-limit groups are malnormal. See [16] for a more detailed discussion of this and of JSJ decompositions.
The construction of the limiting
-tree immediately implies that the abelian JSJ of a non-abelian, freely indecomposable strict
-limit group is nontrivial.
We can also apply the arguments of [26,Theorem3.2] and [25,Theorem3.2] , as adapted in [16] (this adaptation also applies to the results in [17] ) to prove that the cyclic JSJ decomposition of such a group is nontrivial – see Theorem 5.1 below. But first, we recall the shortening argument.
3 The shortening argument
In [16] and [17] we described a version of Sela's shortening argument which worked for sequences of surjective homomorphisms to
, and described in [16] why this notion is insufficient for all sequences of homomorphisms.
In this section we present another version of the shortening argument, which works for all sequences of homomorphisms
, for any finite generated group
. This version was stated but not proved in [17] , and we give the proof here.
There are two equivalent approaches to this version of the shortening argument. The first is to find a group
which contains
and shorten using elements of
, rather than just elements of
(this approach was used in the proof of [16,Theorem7.9] ) . The second approach is to use the `bending' moves of Alibegović [2] . We use the second approach, because it yields a simpler parametrisation of
when we construct Makanin-Razborov diagrams in Section 6 .
Recall the definition of
for a finitely generated group
.
Definition 3.1.
Let
be a finitely generated group. A Dehn twist is an automorphism of one of the following two types:
-
(1)
Suppose that
and that
is contained in the centre of
. Then define
by
for
and
for
;
-
(2)
Suppose that
, that
is in the centre of
, and that
is the stable letter of this HNN extension.
Then define
by
for
and
.
Definition 3.2 (Generalised Dehn twists).
Suppose
has a graph of groups decomposition with abelian edge groups, and
is an abelian vertex group in this decomposition. Let
be the subgroup generated by all edge groups connecting
to other vertex groups in the decomposition. Any automorphism of
that fixes
elementwise can be naturally extended to an automorphism of the ambient group
. Such an automorphism is called a generalised Dehn twist of
.
Definition 3.3.
Let
be a finitely generated group. We define
to be the subgroup of
generated by:
-
(1)
Inner automorphisms;
-
(2)
Dehn twists arising from splittings of
with abelian edge groups; and
-
(3)
Generalised Dehn twists arising from graph of groups decompositions of
with abelian edge groups.
Similar definitions are made in [26,§5] and [4,§1] .
We will try to shorten homomorphisms by precomposing by elements of
. However, as seen in [16,§3] , this is not sufficient to get the most general result. Thus, we also define a further kind of move (very similar to Alibegović's bending move, [2,§2] .
Definition 3.4.
Suppose that
is a torsion-free group which is hyperbolic relative to free abelian subgroups, that
is a finitely generated group and that
is a homomorphism. We define two kinds of `bending' moves as follows:
-
(B1)
Let
be a graph of groups decomposition of
, and let
be an abelian vertex group of
. Suppose that
is contained in a parabolic subgroup
.
A move of type (B1) replaces
by a homomorphism
which is such that (i)
; and (ii)
agrees with
on all edge groups adjacent to
, and all vertex groups other than
.
-
(B2)
Let
be a graph of groups decomposition of
, and let
be an abelian edge group associated to an edge
. Suppose that
is contained in a parabolic subgroup
. A move of type (B2) replaces
by a map which either (i) conjugates a component of
by an element of
, in case
is separating; or (ii) multiplies the stable letter associated to
by an element of
, in case
is non-separating.
Definition 3.5 (cf. Definition 4.2, [4] ; Definition 2.11, [2] ).
We define the relation `
' on the set of homomorphisms
to be the equivalence relation generated by setting
if
is obtained from
by:
-
(1)
precomposing with an element of
;
-
(2)
postcomposing with an inner automorphism of
; or
-
(3)
a bending move of type (B1) or (B2).
Definition 3.6.
Let
be an arbitrary finite generating set for
, and let
be the space upon which
acts properly, cocompactly and isometrically, with basepoint
. For a homomorphism
define
by
A homomorphism
is short if for any
such that
we have
.
The following is the main result of this section.
Theorem 3.7.
Suppose that
is a non-abelian, freely indecomposable and torsion-free group which is hyperbolic relative to a collection of free abelian subgroups. Let
be a freely indecomposable finitely generated group and
be a sequence of non-conjugate homomorphisms which converges to a faithful action of
on
as above. Then, for all but finitely many
, the homomorphism
is not short.
-
Proof.
Suppose that the sequence
converges into a faithful
-action on
. From this we extract a faithful
-action on an
-tree
.
The group
is freely indecomposable and the stabiliser in
of any tripod in
is trivial, so we can apply the decomposition theorem of Sela – [24,Theorem3.1] – and decompose
into subtrees of three types:
axial, IET, and discrete (note that because
is freely indecomposable and tripod stabilisers are trivial, there are no thin components in
).
This decomposition of
induces a graph of groups decomposition of
, which will allow us to shorten
for sufficiently large
. See [24] or [16,
§
4] for more information.
Note that there are two sources for segments in
. There are segments in
, and there are flats in
which are projected to lines in
. We treat these as two separate cases. However, we can make the following simplifications (let
be the collection of lines in
which are projections of flats in
):
-
(1)
Suppose that
is an IET subtree of
and that
is a line in
. Then the intersection
contains at most a point ([16,Proposition4.3] );
-
(2)
Suppose that a line
is an axial subtree of
and and let the line
be in
. If
contains more than a point then
([16,Proposition4.5] );
-
(3)
If an edge
in the discrete part of
has an intersection of positive length with
then
([16,Lemma4.7] ).
Fix a finite generating set
for
. Let
be the basepoint in
, and consider the paths
for
. If there is any IET component of
which intersects any segment
nontrivially then we can apply [23,Theorem5.1] and [16,Corollary4.4] to shorten these intersections whilst leaving the remaining segments unchanged (to see that we can have
finitely generated rather than finitely presented, see [16,Remark4.8] ).
Suppose that some segment
has an intersection of positive length with some axial component
so that
is not contained in any
. Then [16,Theorem5.1] can be used to shorten those segments
intersecting the orbit of
nontrivially, and leaving other segments unchanged.
Suppose that
intersects some line
nontrivially, and that
is an axial component of
. The only place where the proof of [16,Theorem5.2] breaks down is that the images
may not intersect parabolics in its image in denser and denser subsets (when measured with the scaled metric). However, this is exactly what the bending move (B1) is designed to deal with.
We have the following analogue of [16,Proposition5.4] : Let
denote the flat in
which projects to
. The subgroup
is an abelian subgroup of
. There is a sequence of flats
so that
in the Gromov topology. The subgroups
are abelian, and fix the flat
, for sufficiently large
. Thus
is contained in a unique maximal abelian subgroup
of
. If we fix a finite subset
of
and
, then for sufficiently large
, there is an automorphism
so that
-
(1)
For every
, and every
,
-
(2)
For any
which acts trivially on
we have
.
The proof of the existence of such a
is the same as the proof of [16,Proposition5.4] . Such a
induces a move of Type (B1) in a straightforward manner, since the adjacent edge groups to the vertex group
contain elements which act trivially on
, therefore we replace
by the homomorphism which agrees with
on all edge groups and on all vertex groups which are not
, and replaces
by
.
We now construct shortening elements for all but finitely many of the intervals
by following the proof of [23,Theorem5.1] (see [16,
§
5] for more details).
Finally, we are left with the case where
is contained entirely in the discrete part of
. We follow the proof of [16,Theorem6.1] , which in turn followed Section 6 of [23] . This argument naturally splits into a number of cases. Case 1:
is contained in the interior of an edge
.
Case 1a:
is not contained entirely in a line
and
is a splitting edge.
This case follows directly as in [16,
§
6] .
Case 1b:
is not completely contained in a line
and
is not a splitting edge.
This case also follows directly as in [16,
§
6] .
Case 1c:
is contained in a line
and
is a splitting edge.
In this case, we have a graph of groups decomposition
, where
(and
is the flat in
which projects to
).
The Dehn twist which is found in [16,
§
6] is naturally replaced by a bending move of type (B2).
Case 1d:
is contained in a line
and
is not a splitting edge.
Once again the Dehn twist is replaced by a bending move of Type (B2). Case 2:
is a vertex of
.
Once again here there are four cases, depending on whether on edge adjacent to
is or is not a splitting edge and is or is not contained in a line
. In case an edge
is not contained in a line
, we proceed exactly as in [16] , following [23] directly. In case
, we replace the shortening Dehn twists by bending moves of type (B2) as in Case 1 above.
Therefore, in any case, we can find moves which shorten all but finitely many of the
, as required. □
4 Shortening quotients
We now recall the concept of shortening quotients from [26] and [27] .
Let
be a finitely generated group,
a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics and
a stable sequence of homomorphisms, with associated
-limit group
, and suppose that
is
-generated. The shortening procedure constructs a sequence of homomorphisms
which has a subsequence converging to a
-limit group
, equipped with a canonical epimorphism
. We follow the construction from [26,
§
3] and [25] (see [16] for more details in this context).
Given the situation described in the previous paragraph, we now describe the construction of
,
and
. Let
be the canonical abelian JSJ decomposition for
, with vertex groups
and edge groups
.
As in [26] and [16] we do not yet know that the edge groups are finitely generated (though this will eventually turn out to be the case; see Proposition 5.11 below).
We can `approximate' the finitely generated group
by finitely presented groups
, each equipped with a graph of groups decomposition
which is a `lift' of
. See [26,
§
3] and [16] for more details of this.
The output of this is a commutative diagram:
The
-limit group
is the direct limit of the sequence
.
The group
comes with a generating set, and a graph of groups decomposition. The equivalence relation used to define short homomorphisms in the previous section is naturally defined also for the set of homomorphisms
. When defining the equivalence relation for `short', we restrict to those elements of
which come from the graph of groups decomposition
.
The group
is a subgroup of
(and the map
is inclusion), and comes with a generating set
, which corresponds to a generating set for
coming from the graph of groups decomposition
. For a homomorphism
define the following stretching constant:
| |
| |
Also define the corresponding
-tuple
Now for each
choose a homomorphism
so that
and so that
is minimal amongst all homomorphisms equivalent to
(the set of
-tuples is given the lexicographic order).
Passing to a subsequence of
, we obtain an associated
-limit group
. There are two cases to consider here: (i)
is a strict
-limit group; and (ii)
is not a strict
-limit group. In case (ii), let
be given by
, where
is the free group of rank
and
is the canonical quotient map. Since
is not a strict
-limit group, we may assume that the (convergent) subsequence of
is constant, and
is isomorphic to a subgroup of
. In this case, since each image
is isomorphic to
via the natural map between generating sets, it is not hard to see that
and
are isomorphic via the natural map between generating sets.
In case
is a strict
-limit group, each vertex group
is embedded canonically in
(see [26,
§
3
] or [16,
§
7
] for more details). We also claim that there is a canonical epimorphism
. To see this, it remains to see that each of the relations corresponding to stable letters in
are preserved when the canonical generating set for
is mapped to the canonical generating set for
. For each such relation
, there is some
so that for all
the group
includes
as a defining relation. This defining relation is preserved by the shortening moves, and so holds in the
-limit group
.
The above group
is called the shortening quotient of
associated to
.
Although we speak of the shortening quotient, it depends on the choices of shortest homomorphism in the equivalence class of
, and also on the convergent subsequence of
chosen. Of course, it also depends on the choice of finite generating set for
, but we assume this is fixed.
Proposition 4.1 (cf. Proposition 1.15, [27] ).
Let
be a finitely generated group, and
a torsion free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics, and let
be a sequence of homomorphisms that converges into an action of a non-abelian, freely indecomposable strict
-limit group
on an
-tree
. If for every index
, the group
is not isomorphic to
by the natural map that sends the images of the generators of
in
to the images of these generators in
, then every shortening quotient of
which is obtained from the sequence
is a proper quotient of
.
-
Proof (of Proposition 4.1 ).
Suppose that
is the shortening quotient of
associated to
as described above, and let
be the homomorphism arising from
, where
is the canonical quotient map. Let
denote the convergent subsequence.
The hypothesis of the proposition implies that
is a strict
-limit group, and that
do not belong to finitely many conjugacy classes.
Since each of the
is short, the shortening argument implies that the limiting action cannot be faithful, which is to say that
is a proper quotient of
. □
5
-limit groups
In this section we follow [27] in order to understand
-limit groups, and
, where
is an aribitrary finitely generated group. The main technical results of this section are Theorem 5.1 , Theorem 5.2 and Theorem 5.7 .
These results are then applied to prove various applications of these results: Theorem 5.9 , Proposition 5.10 , Theorem 5.15 , and in the next section the construction of Makanin-Razborov diagrams.
Theorem 5.1 (cf. Theorem 3.2, p. 14, [26] ).
Let
be a torsion-free group which is hyperbolic relative to a collection of free abelian subgroups, and let
be a strict
-limit group which is nonabelian and freely indecomposable. Then
admits a principal cyclic splitting.
-
Proof.
The strategy is to follow the proof of [26,Theorem3.2] , which is very similar to the proof of [25,Theorem3.2] , the difference being in [26] that there might be abelian subgroups of the limit group which are not locally cyclic.
In the proof of the Hopf property for
, we have already adapted [25,Theorem3.2] to the current context (see [16] and [17] ), and we already there had to deal with abelian subgroups of the
-limit group which are not locally cyclic. Therefore, the proof of this theorem proceeds almost exactly as in [16] (with the translations made in [17] ).
The only substantial difference is that we need to use the improved version of the shortening argument presented in Section 3 of this paper.
One of the key points of the proof is a construction very similar to that of shortening quotients as in the previous section, although for this proof this construction is used in the process of deducing an elaborate contradiction. □
Let
be a fixed finitely generated group. Define an order on the set of
-limit groups that are quotients of
as follows: suppose
and
are both
-limit groups that are quotients of
, and that
are the (fixed) canonical quotient maps. We say
if there exists an epimorphism with non-trivial kernel
so that
. We say that
and
are equivalent if there is an isomorphism
so that
.
The following is one of the main technical results of this paper.
Theorem 5.2 (cf. Theorem 1.12, [27] ).
Let
be a torsion-free group which is hyperbolic relative to free abelian subgroups, and let
be a finitely generated group. Every decreasing sequence of
-limit groups that are quotients of
:
terminates after finitely many steps.
For limit groups, the analogous result has a short proof using algebraic geometry (see [4] ). However (as observed by M. Kapovich; see, for example, [5,
§
1.4] ), not all hyperbolic groups are linear and the same is therefore true for relatively hyperbolic groups.
Before we prove Theorem 5.2 , we prove the following lemma (implicit in [27,p.7] ):
Lemma 5.3.
Let
be a finitely generated group, let
be a
-limit group and suppose that
is
-generated. Then
can be obtained as a limit of homomorphisms
, where
is the free group of rank
.
-
Proof.
If
can be embedded in
, then we can take the constant sequence
, where
, for a fixed surjection
and fixed embedding
.
Otherwise, suppose that
is obtained from a sequence
. Suppose that
is a generating set for
. For each
, define
to be generated by elements
, where
. Now define
by
, where
is a basis of
. It is not difficult to see that
is realised as the limit of the sequence of homomorphisms
. □
-
Proof (of Theorem 5.2 ).
We follow the proof of [27,Theorem1.12] .
In order to obtain a contradiction, we suppose that there exists a finitely generated group
, for which there exists an infinite descending sequence of
-limit groups:
Without loss of generality, we may assume that
, the free group of rank
. Let
be a basis for
, and let
be the Cayley graph of
with respect to this generating set. We construct a particular descreasing sequence of
-limit groups as follows. Let
be a
-limit group with the following properties:
-
(1)
is a proper quotient of
;
-
(2)
can be extended to an infinite decreasing sequence of
-limit groups:
;
-
(3)
The map
maps to the identity the maximal number of elements in the ball of radius
about the identity in
among all possible maps from
to a
-limit group
that satisfies the first two conditions.
Continue to define the sequence inductively. Suppose that the finite sequence
has been constructed, and choose
to satisfy:
-
(1)
is a proper quotient of
;
-
(2)
The finite decreasing sequence of
-limit groups
can be extended to an infinite decreasing sequence; and
-
(3)
The map
maps to the identity the maximal number of elements in the ball of radius
about the identity in
among all possible maps from
to a
-limit group
satisfying the first two conditions.
It is worth noting that we do not insist that the
-limit groups
be strict
-limit groups. This will be important later, because to study a single homomorphism, we consider a constant sequence, which leads to a
-limit group which need not be strict.
Since each of the
-limit groups
is a quotient of
, each
is
-generated. Let
be a generating set for
. By Lemma 5.3 ,
can be obtained as a limit of a sequence of homomorphisms
, with the quotient map
sending
to
.
For each
, choose a homomorphism
for which:
-
(1)
Every element in the ball of radius
about the identity in
that is mapped to the identity by
is mapped to the identity by
. Every such element that is mapped to a nontrivial element by
is mapped to a nontrivial element by
; and
-
(2)
There exists an element
that is mapped to the identity by
for which
.
Denote the homomorphism
by
. By construction, the set of homomorphisms
does not belong to a finite set of conjugacy classes. Therefore, from the sequence
we can extract a subsequence that converges into a (strict)
-limit group, denoted
. By construction, the
-limit group
is the direct limit of the sequence of (proper) epimorphisms:
Let
be the canonical quotient map.
Lemma 5.4 (cf. Lemma 1.13, [27] ).
-
(1)
the set of homomorphisms
do not belong to finitely many conjugacy classes, hence
is a strict
-limit group;
-
(2)
is not finitely presented;
-
(3)
is not the free product of a finitely presented group and freely indecomposable
-limit groups that do not admit a cyclic splitting;
-
(4)
Let
be the most refined (Grushko) free decomposition of
, where
is a finitely generated group. Then there exists an index
, with
, for which:
-
(a)
is not finitely presented;
-
(b)
If
is a finitely generated subgroup of
such that
then the restrictions
do not belong to finitely many conjugacy classes. Furthermore, if
is a generating set for
, then for every index
, the group
is not isomorphic to
by an isomorphism that sends
to
.
-
Proof (of Lemma 5.4 ).
Given Theorem 5.1 , the proof of this is identical to that of [27,Lemma1.13] . □
The
-limit group
is a proper quotient of each of the
-limit groups
. For each index
, the group
was chosen to maximise the number of elements in the ball of radius
about the identity in
that are mapped to the identity in
among all
-limit groups that are proper quotients of
and that admit an infinite descending chain of
-limit groups. Therefore, it is not difficult to see that
does not admit an infinite descending chain of
-limit groups.
We now obtain a finite resolution of
:
Proposition 5.5 (cf. Proposition 1.16, [27] ).
Let
be the sequence of homomorphisms constructed above. Then there exists a finite sequence of
-limit groups:
so that
-
(1)
The epimorphisms along the sequence are proper epimorphisms;
-
(2)
Let
be the (possibly trivial) Grushko free decomposition of
. There exists a subsequence
of
so that each of the homomorphisms
can be written in the form;
where each
, and
is a homomorphism that embeds each of the factors
of
into
;
-
(3)
The sequence of homomorphism
converges into a faithful action of
on ann
-tree
. Furthermore, the entire sequence of homomorphisms
factors through the epimorphism
.
-
Proof (of Proposition 5.5 ).
Given Lemma 5.4 and Proposition 4.1 the proof is identical to that of [27,Proposition1.16] .
We note that the groups
are found by taking successive shortening quotients, so that
is a shortening quotient of
. □
The homomorphisms
were chosen so that for every index
there exists some element
for which
and
. Since
is a proper quotient of all of the
-limit groups
, for every index
and every element
, if
then
. By Part 3 of Proposition 5.5 it is possible to extract a subsequence
that factors through the group
, which is to say that there is a homomorphism
so that
. Hence, for every index
, and every element
, if
then
, which implies that
, in contradiction to the way that the homomorphisms
were chosen.
This finally ends the proof of Theorem 5.2 . □
Corollary 5.6.
Let
be a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics, and let
be a
-limit group.
Then
is Hopfian.
Corollary 5.6 generalises one of the main results of [17] , and implies that the relation defined on
-limit groups which are quotients of a fixed group
is a partial order. The proof of the following theorem is identical to that of [27,Theorem1.17] .
Theorem 5.7 (cf. Theorem 1.17, [27] ).
Let
be a finitely generated group and
a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics, and let
be a sequence of homomorphisms. Then there exists a finite sequence of
-limit groups:
for which
-
(1)
is an epimorphism and
is a proper epimorphism for each
;
-
(2)
Let
be the Grushko free decomposition of
. Then there exists a subsequence
os
so that each of the homomorphisms
can be decomposed as:
where
and
embeds each of the freely indecomposable factors
of
into
;
-
(3)
The sequence of homomorphisms
is either constant or converges into a faithful action of
on a tree-graded space
. Furthermore, the entire sequence of homomorphisms
factor through the epimorphism
.
Given Theorem 5.7 , if a sequence
converges into a
-limit group
, then by passing to a subsequence we may assume that each
factors through the canonical quotient map
, so we may replace
by a sequence of homomorphisms from
to
. This simplifies the definition of shortening quotients considerably, since we may start with a sequence
. Proposition 4.1 still holds in this context (in fact the proof is easier).
Definition 5.8.
Let
and
be finitely generated groups.
We say that
is fully residually
is for every finite
there is a homomorphism
which is injective on
.
Theorem 5.9.
Let
be a nonabelian torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics. A finitely generated group
is a
-limit group if and only if it is fully residually
.
-
Proof.
If
is a fully residually
then it is certainly a
-limit group.
Suppose that
is a
-limit group, obtained from a sequence
. By Theorem 5.7 , by passing to a subsequence we may assume that each of the
factor through the
-limit group
. Now it is clear that
is fully residually
. □
Proposition 5.10.
Let
be a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics. Then there are only countably many
-limit groups.
-
Proof.
If
is abelian, then all
-limit groups are finitely generated abelian groups, of which there are only countably many.
Suppose then that
is nonabelian. We apply the proof of Theorem 5.7 , along with the construction of shortening quotients. By Theorem 5.7 , for any
-limit group
there is a finitely generated free group
and a sequence
where each of the non-free factors in the Grushko decomposition of
admits an embedding into
, and each
is a shortening quotient of the previous term in the sequence. We consider the limit groups which arise with sequences of increasing lengths, and note that there are only countably many for each length.
If
, then
is the free product of finitely many finitely generated subgroups of
and (possibly) a finitely generated free group.
Since there are countably many finitely generated subgroups of
, there are countably many such
-limit groups.
We now consider hot to obtain
from
. First,
admits a Grushko free decomposition into freely indecomposable nonabelian
-limit groups, along with possibly a free group and a free product of finitely generated free abelian groups. Each freely indecomposable nonabelian factor
of
admits a graph of groups decomposition
, whose edge groups are free abelian groups. By induction on
, and the fact that abelian subgroups of
are finitely generated, we may assume that these edge groups are finitely generated. The vertex groups of
are either abelian groups, surface groups, or embed in
(by the construction of shortening quotients; see Section 4 ). Therefore, each such free factor of
can be formed by taking finitely many HNN extensions and amalgamated free products of finitely generated subgroups of
over finitely generated abelian subgroups. There are only countably many such constructions. This completes the proof. □
The following result follows from the proof of Proposition 5.10 .
Corollary 5.11.
Any abelian subgroup of a
-limit group is finitely generated free abelian.
Proposition 5.12 (cf. Proposition 1.20, [27] ).
Let
be a finitely generated group and
a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics. Let
be a sequence of
-limit groups that are all quotients of
so that
Then there exists a
-limit group
, a quotient of
, so that
for all
.
-
Proof.
For each
, choose a homomorphism
that factors through the quotient map
as
and so that
is injective on the ball of radius
in
. This is possible by Theorem 5.7 .
A subsequence of
converges to a
-limit group
, which is a quotient of
. By Theorem 5.7 , we may assume that each element of this subsequence factors through the canonical quotient map
.
We prove that
for each
. We have quotient maps
, and
. Since
there exists
so that
. In particular,
.
Let
be the fixed finite generating set for
. We attempt to define a homomorphism
as follows: for
, define
. This is well-defined if and only if
. Therefore, suppose that
. Since each
factors through
, we have
for all
. Suppose that
lies in the ball of radius
about the identity in the Cayley graph of
. Then for all
, the element
lies in the ball of radius
about the identity in
. Since
, for all
, and by the defining property of the
, if
then
.
Thus since for all
we have
we have
, as required. We have constructed a homomorphism
so that
, which is to say that
. This finishes the proof. □
Propositions 5.10 and 5.12 imply that there are maximal elements for the set of
-limit groups which are quotients of a fixed finitely generated group
, under the order described before Theorem 5.2 .
Recall that we say that two
-limit groups which are quotients of
,
and
are equivalent if there is an isomorphism
so that
.
Proposition 5.13 (cf. Proposition 1.21, [27] ).
Let
be a finitely generated group and
a torsion-free group hyperbolic relative to free abelian subgroups. Then there are only finitely many equivalence classes of maximal elements in the set of
-limit groups that are quotients of
.
-
Proof.
The following proof was explained to me by Zlil Sela in the context of torsion-free hyperbolic groups. The same proof works in the current context.
Suppose on the contrary that there are infinitely many non-equivalent maximal
-limit groups
, each a quotient of
. Let
be the canonical quotient map. Fixing a finite generating set
for
, we fix a finite generating set for each of the
, and hence obtain maps
, where
. There is a fixed quotient map
so that for each
we have
.
For each
, consider the set of words of length
in
that are mapped to the identity by
. This set is finite for each
, and there is a bound on its size, so there is a subsequence of the
so that this set is the same for all
. Starting with this subsequence, consider those words of length
in
which are mapped to the identity by
, and again there is a subsequence for which this (bounded) collection is the same for all
. Continue with this process for all lengths of words in
, passing to finer and finer subsequences, and consider the diagonal subsequence.
We continue to denote this subsequence by
.
Now, for each
, choose a homomorphism
so that for words
of length at most
in
, we have
if and only if
, and so that
factors through the quotient map
.
This is possible because each
is a
-limit group which is a quotient of
.
A subsequence of
converges into a
-limit group
, which is a quotient of
since all
factor through
. Let
be the canonical quotient, and
the quotient for which
. Note that a word
of length at most
in
maps to the identity under
if and only if
.
Now,
are non-equivalent maximal
-limit quotients, so (possibly discarding one
which is equivalent to
) are all non-equivalent to
. Therefore, for each
there does not exist a homomorphism
so that
. That is to say that for each
there exists
so that
but
.
We now construct a new sequence of homomorphisms
that all factor through
so that
-
a word
of length at most
satisfies
if and only if
; and
-
.
By Theorem 5.5 there is a subsequence
of
which converges into a
-limit group (which must be
) so that each
factors through
. Therefore, there is
so that
.
However, we have that
, but
, a contradiction. This contradicts the existence of
, and finishes the proof. □
Definition 5.14.
A group
is a called equationally Noetherian if every system of equations over
in finitely many variables is equivalent to a finite subsystem.
The following theorem answers a question (essentially) asked by Sela [28,I.8(ii)] . We believe that relatively hyperbolic groups with abelian parabolics form a more natural context for this question than CAT
groups with isolated flats. In this context, [28,I.8(i)] was answered by the author in [17] and [28,I.8(iii)] is answered in Theorem 6.4 below.
Theorem 5.15 (cf. Theorem 1.22, [27] ).
Suppose that
is a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics.
-
Proof.
We follow the proof of [27,Theorem1.22] .
Let
be a system of equations in finitely many variables over
. We iteratively construct a directed locally finite tree as follows. Start with the first equation
in
, and associate with it a one relator group
, generated by the variables of
with relator corresponding to
.
By Proposition 5.13 , to
is associated finitely many maximal
-limit groups
which are quotients of
. Place
at the root node of a tree, and a directed edge from
to each
.
Now let
be the second equation in
, and consider each
in turn. If
represents the trivial element of
, leave it unchanged. If
is nontrivial in
, define
. With
, we associate its finite collection of maximal
-limit quotients, and extend the locally finite tree by adding new vertices for these quotients of
, and directed edges joining
to each of its quotients.
Continue this procedure iteratively. By Theorem 5.2 , each branch of this locally finite tree is finite, and therefore by Konig's Lemma the entire tree is finite. This implies that the construction of this tree terminates after finitely many steps, which implies that
is equivalent to a finite subsystem. □
Guba [19] proved the analogous theorem for free groups, whilst Sela [27] proved it for torsion-free hyperbolic groups.
6 Makanin-Razborov diagrams
In this final section, we describe the construction of Makanin-Razborov diagrams for
, which give a description of the set
, where
is an arbitrary finitely generated group. This is analogous to the constructions in [26,
§
5
] and [27,
§
1
] .
Let
be a freely indecomposable
-limit group, and let
be a fixed generating set for
. We assume that we always use the generating set
to define the length of homomorphisms, and hence to find short homomorphisms.
We need to understand those shortening quotients of
obtained from sequences of homomorphisms
so that each
is a proper quotient of
. By Proposition 4.1 , each such shortening quotient is a proper quotient of
.
Following [26, 27] we say that two proper shortening quotients
of
are equivalent if there is an isomorphism
so that the canonical quotient maps
, for
satisfy
.
This defines an equivalence relation on the set of shortening quotients of
, paired with the canonical quotient maps:
.
Let
be the set of (proper) shortening quotients of
. On the set
we define a partial order as follows:
given two proper shortening quotients
of
, along with canonical quotients
, we say that
if there exists a proper epimorphism
so that
.
Lemma 6.1 (cf. Lemma 1.23, [27] ).
Let
be a freely-indecomposable
-limit group. Let
(where
) be a properly increasing sequence of (proper) shortening quotients of
. Then there exists a shortening quotient
so that for each
we have
.
-
Proof.
Restricting to short homomorphisms throughout, the proof is identical to that of Proposition 5.12 above. □
Lemma 6.2 (cf. Lemma 1.24, [27] ).
Let
be a freely-indecomposable
-limit group. The set,
, of (proper) shortening quotients of
contains only finitely many equivalence classes of maximal elements with respect to the partial order.
-
Proof.
Once again, restricting throughout to short homomorphisms, the proof is identical to the of Proposition 5.13 above. □
We can now use shortening quotients to `encode and simplify' all homomorphisms from a freely-indecomposable
-limit group into
.
Proposition 6.3 (cf. Proposition 1.25, [27] ).
Suppose that
is a freely-indecomposable
-limit group. Let
be a generating set for
, and let
be a set of representatives of the (finite) set of equivalence classes of maximal (proper) shortening quotients in
, equipped with the canonical quotient maps
, for
.
Let
be a homomorphism which is not an embedding.
Then there exist a (not necessarily unique) index
, a modular automorphism
, and a homomorphism
so that
/
-
Proof.
Choose
so that
is short. The constant sequence
converges into a proper shortening quotient
of
. Now,
, and the canonical quotient map is just
. There exists some
so that
or
is equivalent to
. In either case, we get the required conclusion. □
Finally, we now construct Makanin-Razborov diagrams over
. Let
be an aribtrary finitely generated group. By Proposition 5.13 ,
has finitely many (equivalence classes of ) maximal
-limit quotients,
, say. We now continue with each of the
in parallel.
Let
be one such maximal
-limit quotient of
. The there is a free factorisation,
, where each
is a freely-indecomposable non-cyclic subgroup of
and
is a finitely generated free group. Let
generate
, and
generate
, etc.
By Lemma 6.1 the set of (proper) shortening quotients of
contain maximal elements, and by Lemma 6.2 there are only finite many equivalence classes of maximal
-limit quotients of each
. For
, let
be a collection of representatives of the equivalence classes of maximal proper shortening quotients in
, and let
be the canonical quotient map.
We now define the Makanin-Razborov diagram of
iteratively. Start by mapping
to its finite collection of maximal
-limit quotients, and continue with each of the maximal
-limit quotients in parallel.
Denote such a maximal
-limit quotient of
by
. Factor
into
as above. To each of the factors
associate
directed edges starting at
and terminating at
, a maximal shortening
-limit quotient of
. Do not proceed from
.
Now for each
we find a free product factorisation and to each (nonfree) factor associate the finitely many maximal shortening quotients.
This procedure terminates after finitely many steps by Theorem 5.2 (and Konig's Lemma). We have constructed the Makanin-Razborov diagram associated to
.
In summary, we have
Theorem 6.4 (cf. Theorem 1.26, [27] ).
Let
be a finitely generated group and
a torsion-free relatively hyperbolic group with abelian parabolics. Associated to
is a Makanin-Razborov diagram, with vertices
-limit quotients, and edges the canonical quotient map. Any homomorphism
can be given by compositions of modular automorphisms of the
-limit groups in the diagram with the canonical maps from
-limit groups into their maximal proper shortening quotients, and finally with either embeddings of a
-limit group in the diagram into
, or general homomorphisms of the terminal free groups that appear in the diagram into
.
Theorem 6.4 answers a question (essentially) asked by Sela [28,ProblemI.8(iii)] . See the discussion above Theorem 5.15 above.
In the future work [18] we will continue the study of the elementary theory of
.
References
-
E. Alibegović, A combination theorem for relatively hyperbolic groups, Bull. LMS, to appear.
-
E. Alibegović, Makanin-Razborov diagrams for limit groups, preprint.
-
M. Bestvina and M. Feighn, Bounding the complexity of simplicial group actions, Invent. Math. 103 (1991), 449–469.
-
M Bestvina and M. Feighn, Notes on Sela's work: Limit groups and Makanin-Razborov diagrams, preprint.
-
M. Bestvina, Questions in geometric group theory, available at http://www.math.utah.edu/
bestvina.
-
B. Bowditch, Relatively hyperbolic groups, preprint.
-
F. Dahmani, Classifying spaces and boundaries for relatively hyperbolic groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 86 (2003), 666–684.
-
F. Dahmani, Combination of convergence groups, Geom. Topol. 7 (2003), 933–963.
-
F. Dahmani, Accidental parabolics and relatively hyperbolic groups, preprint.
-
C. Druţ u and M. Sapir, Tree-graded spaces and asymptotic cones of groups, preprint.
-
C. Druţ u and M. Sapir, Relatively hyperbolic groups with rapid decay property, preprint.
-
M. Dunwoody, The accessibility of finitely presented groups, Invent. Math. 81 (1985), 449–457.
-
B. Farb, Relatively hyperbolic groups, GAFA 8 (1998), 810–840.
-
M. Gromov, Hyperbolic groups, in Essays in group theory (S.M. Gersten, ed.), Springer Verlag, MSRI Publ. 8 (1987), 75-263.
-
D. Groves, Limits of (certain) CAT
groups, I: Compactification, preprint. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math.GR/0404440.
-
D. Groves, Limits of (certain) CAT
groups, II: The Hopf property and the shortening argument, preprint. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math.GR/0408080.
-
D. Groves, Limit groups for relatively hyperbolic groups, I: The basic tools, preprint. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math.GR/0412492.
-
D. Groves, The elementary theory of torsion-free relatively hyperbolic groups with abelian parabolics, in preparation.
-
V. Guba, Equivalence of infinite systems of equations in free groups and semigroups to finite subsystems, Math. Zametki 40 (1986), 321–324.
-
O. Kharlampovich and A. Miasnikov, Irreducible affine varieties over a free group. I, II. J. Alg. 200 (1998), 472–516, 517–570.
-
D. Osin, Relatively hyperbolic groups: Intrinsic geometry, algebraic properties, and algorithmic properties, preprint.
-
E. Rips, Subgroups of small cancellation groups, Bull. LMS 14 (1982), 45–47.
-
E. Rips and Z. Sela, Structure and rigidity in hyperbolic groups I, GAFA 4 (1994), 337—371.
-
Z. Sela, Acylindrical accessibility for groups, Invent. Math. 129 (1997), 527–565.
-
Z. Sela, Endomorphisms of hyperbolic groups I: The Hopf property, Topology 38 (1999), 301-321.
-
Z. Sela, Diophantine geometry over groups, I: Makanin-Razborov diagrams. Publ. Math. IHES 93 (2001), 31–105.
-
Z.. Sela, Diophantine geometry over groups VIII: The elementary theory of a hyperbolic group, preprint.
-
Z. Sela, Diophantine geometry over groups: a list of research problems, http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/
zlil/problems.dvi/
-
A. Szczepanski, Relatively hyperbolic groups, Michigan Math. J. 45 (1998), 611–618.
-
A. Yaman, A topological characterisation of relatively hyperbolic groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 566 (2004), 41–89.
Daniel Groves, Department of Mathematics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA E-mail address : groves@caltech.edu