The first author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-0140172.
<ph f="cmbx">On the </ph> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi>K</mi> </math> <ph f="cmbx">-theory of smooth toric DM stacks</ph>

Lev A. Borisov and R. Paul Horja

Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, borisov@math.wisc.edu, The Fields Institute, 222 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3J1, Canada, horja@fields.utoronto.ca.

1 Introduction

In this paper we calculate the Grothendieck K   -theory rings of coherent sheaves on smooth toric Deligne-Mumford stacks. These stacks, which generalize the notion of a smooth toric variety, have been defined in [BCS.
We are mostly interested in the reduced case, which is characterized by the condition that there is an open substack which is a subscheme.
However, since our technique is applicable to non-reduced stacks as well, we extend the result to the general case in a separate section. We find that the Grothendieck group of a smooth toric Deligne-Mumford stack
P Σ   is generated by classes of invertible sheaves, and we find the generators of the ideal of relations satisfied by these sheaves. In the reduced case K 0 ( P Σ )   is generated by the classes R i   of the invertible sheaves i   which correspond to the one-dimensional cones of the fan Σ   . These sheaves generalize the sheaves O ( D i )   for codimension one strata D i   in a smooth toric variety. Moreover, we find the generators of the ideal of relations among R i ± 1   .
Theorem  4.10 . Let B   be the quotient of the Laurent polynomial ring Z [ x 1 , x 1 1 , , x n , x n 1 ]   by the ideal generated by the relations
Then the map ρ : B K 0 ( P Σ )   which sends x i   to R i   is an isomorphism.
We also show that the
K   -theory with complex coefficients is a semilocal Artinian C   -algebra and explicitly describe its local components. We produce a vector space isomorphism between the K   -theory with complex coefficients and a combinatorially defined ring dubbed SR-cohomology, which we call combinatorial Chern character. It generalizes the usual Chern character in the case of projective toric varieties and is expected to coincide with the equivariant Chern character of [AR(see also the very recent preprint [JKK) in the projective DM stack case.
The paper is structured as follows. In Section
 2 we recall the definition and basic properties of smooth toric DM stacks. We restrict our attention to the reduced case, which makes the Gale duality construction of [BCSsignificantly easier to describe. In Section  3 we introduce the SR-cohomology in the reduced case and describe its decomposition into sectors. In Section  4 we calculate the K   -theory of the reduced smooth toric DM stack. The key idea is to use the homogenization trick of [Eto resolve any coherent sheaf on P Σ   by direct sums of invertible sheaves.
Section
 5 defines the combinatorial Chern character, and Section  6 extends the results of Sections  4 and  5 to the nonreduced case. Sections  7 ,  8 and  9 describe the K   -theory pullbacks and pushforwards for special classes of morphisms between reduced smooth toric DM stacks. These results will be used in a subsequent paper [BHon homological mirror symmetry and the GKZ hypergeometric system of partial differential equations.
There is some overlap between the results of this paper and those of the recent preprint
[Ba, where the equivariant K-theory of smooth toric varieties is studied with the help of the Merkurjev's spectral sequence.

2 Review of reduced smooth toric DM stacks

In this section we will briefly review the definitions of toric Deligne-Mumford stacks, as developed in [BCS. We are specifically interested in the reduced case, which simplifies the construction significantly.
Let
N   be a free abelian group, and let Σ   be a simplicial fan in N   .
See
[Ffor the definition of a fan. A stacky fan Σ   is defined as the data ( Σ , { v i } )   where { v i }   is a collection of lattice points, one for each one-dimensional cone C i Σ   . We require v i C i ( N { 0 } )   , but v i   may or may not be the minimum lattice point on C i   . The paper [BCSmakes an additional technical assumption
elements v i span a finite index subgroup of N . (1)
Remark 2.1. It is likely that this assumption  1 is just an artifact of the technique of [BCS. In general, one can always look at the preimage N f   in N   of the torsion part of N / S p a n ( v i , i = 1 , , n )   . The quotient N / N f   splits off (noncanonically) as a free direct summand. It is reasonable to expect that the DM stack that corresponds to Σ   is the product of ( C * ) r k ( N / N f )   and the toric DM stack of [BCSconstructed for Σ   in N f   instead of N   . However, the functoriality of this construction is a bit unclear, in view of the fact that the splitting is non–canonical.
The collection { v i } , i = 1 , , n   gives a map φ : Z n N   with finite cokernel. We dualize to get an injective map φ : N ( Z n ) .   The Gale dual of φ   (see [BCS) is simply the map ( Z n ) C o k e r ( φ ) .   Denote by G   the algebraic group H o m ( C o k e r ( φ ) , C * ) .   The exact sequence
0 N ( Z n ) C o k e r ( φ ) 0 (2)
leads to the exact sequence 0 G ( C * ) n H o m ( N , C * ) .   Hence, G   can be thought of as a subgroup of ( C * ) n   . Its C   -points can be thought of as collections of n   nonzero complex numbers λ i , i = 1 , , n   which satisfy the condition
n i = 1 λ i f ( v i ) = 1 (3)
for all linear functions f : N Z   .
Consider the subset
Z   of C n   that consists of all the points z = ( z 1 , , z n )   such that the set of v i   for the zero coordinates of z   is contained in a cone of Σ   . Then the toric DM stack P Σ   that corresponds to the stacky fan Σ = ( Σ , { v i } )   is defined as the stack quotient [ Z / G ]   where Z   and G   are endowed with the natural reduced scheme structures.
The action of
( λ i )   on ( z i )   is given by ( λ i z i )   . It has been shown in [BCSthat P Σ   is a Deligne-Mumford stack whose moduli space is the simplicial toric variety P Σ   .
To a cone in
C   one can associate a closed substack of P Σ   by looking at the quotient of N   by the sublattice spanned by v i C   . The new fan is defined as the image of the link of C   in Σ   , and the new v j   are the images of the old v j   from the link. Unfortunately, this procedure may introduce torsion into N   , so the resulting substack is not reduced.
Moreover, in order for the construction of
[BCSto work, the images of v j   from the link of C   need to generate a finite index subgroup in N / S p a n ( v i C )   . The easiest way to assure this is by imposing a stronger technical condition
every cone of Σ is contained in a cone of dimension rk N , (4)
see [BCS. This also assures that P Σ   is covered by open substacks of the form C r k N / G i   where G i   are finite abelian groups. These open substacks can be indexed by the cones in Σ   of maximum dimension. On the other hand, one can definitely talk about closed toric subvarieties of the coarse moduli space P Σ   of P Σ   without the additional assumption  4 . Throughout this paper we will only use the assumption  1 .

3 Orbifold cohomology and SR-cohomology of reduced smooth toric DM stacks

In this section we introduce some combinatorial invariants of toric DM stacks which we call SR-cohomology rings. They coincide with the orbifold cohomology rings in the projective case but are generally different, even for smooth toric varieties.
A natural combinatorial invariant of a fan is the partial semigroup ring
Z [ N , Σ ]   which is defined as a free abelian group with the basis { [ w ] , w N Σ }   indexed by the lattice elements inside the support of the fan and multiplication [ w 1 ] * [ w 2 ] = { [ w 1 + w 2 ] , i f t h e r e e x i s t s C Σ , C w 1 , w 2 0 , o t h e r w i s e .   The rings Q [ N , Σ ]   and C [ N , Σ ]   are defined analogously. For a stacky fan Σ   , these rings are given additional structure of graded rings. The grading can take nonnegative rational values. It is defined by deg ( [ w ] ) = i α i   where w = i α i v i   is the unique way of writing w   as a rational linear combination of v i   that lie in the minimum cone of Σ   that contains it.
To any stacky fan
Σ   one can associate a SR-cohomology ring, to be denoted by H S R ( P Σ , C )   .
Definition 3.1. Pick a basis { f 1 , , f r k N }   of H o m ( N , Z )   . Each f i   gives rise to a degree one element t i : = j = 1 n f i ( v j ) [ v j ]   in C [ N , Σ ]   . Then H S R ( P Σ , C ) : = C [ N , Σ ] / t 1 , , t r k N .   The rings H S R ( P Σ , Q )   and H S R ( P Σ , Z )   are defined analogously.
It is clear that the above defined SR-cohomology rings are independent of the choice of the basis { f i }   . If P Σ   is a smooth projective toric variety, then its combinatorial cohomology rings are isomorphic to its usual cohomology rings. Indeed, this is precisely the Stanley-Reisner presentation of the cohomology ring of a smooth projective toric variety.
This is the motivation behind our notation
H S R   . We call our rings SR-cohomology rings, as opposed to Stanley-Reisner cohomology rings, to avoid confusion with the term Stanley-Reisner ring that is already used in the literature.
Remark 3.2. We abuse notation slightly and still use H S R ( P Σ , * )   even if Σ   does not satisfy  1 . Hopefully, one will eventually define toric stacks without this restriction.
The main technical result of [BCSconnects the SR-cohomology of a smooth toric DM stack with its orbifold cohomology, see [CRand [AGV. However, one needs an important additional assumption that the coarse moduli space P Σ   is projective.
Theorem 3.3. ([BCS) For any P Σ   such that P Σ   is projective, there holds H o r b ( P Σ , Q ) = H S R ( P Σ , Q ) .  
Remark 3.4. In general, the SR-cohomology and orbifold or usual cohomology rings are different. The simplest example is given by the fan Σ   which is the union of the first and the third quadrants in Z 2   . The elements v i   are ( ± 1 , 0 )   and ( 0 , ± 1 )   .
The corresponding variety is
P 1 × P 1 { ( 0 , ) , ( , 0 ) }   . The SR-cohomology is three-dimensional, with dimension 2   graded component of degree one. It is unclear what geometrically defined cohomology theory on P 1 × P 1 { ( 0 , ) , ( , 0 ) }   can produce such a ring.
Despite Remark  3.4 , the SR-cohomology ring H S R ( P Σ , C )   is very well behaved.
Proposition 3.5. The SR-cohomology ring H S R ( P Σ , C )   of any (reduced) stacky fan Σ   is a finite dimensional complex vector space. It is a local Artinian graded C   -algebra with the maximum ideal given by the span of the elements of positive degree.
In the case of projective P Σ   , there is a natural decomposition of the orbifold and SR-cohomology into direct sum of sectors. Each sector corresponds to the usual cohomology of some closed toric subvariety of P Σ   . We observe that this decomposition still occurs for the SR-cohomology, even without the projectivity assumption. Moreover, we will not even assume  1 .
Definition 3.6. The untwisted sector of SR-cohomology is defined as the subring of H S R ( P Σ , C )   generated by the images of [ v i ] , i = 1 , , n   .
Remark 3.7. It is easy to see that the choice of v i   in the corresponding one-dimesnional cone does not change the untwisted sector much, if one works with rational or complex coefficients. Indeed, one can simply rescale the corresponding variables. Consequently, we can talk about the SR-cohomology of the toric variety P Σ   , in analogy with the projective case. We can define it as the untwisted sector of the SR-cohomology of the stack P Σ   obtained by picking the v i   to be the smallest lattice points on the one-dimensional cones of Σ   . We denote these rings by H S R ( P Σ , Q o r C )   .
For a cone C Σ   , let B o x ( C )   be the set of elements v   of N   which are linear combinations with rational coefficients in the range [ 0 , 1 )   of elements v i C   . Let B o x ( Σ )   be the union of B o x ( C )   for all C Σ   .
Proposition 3.8. As a module over the untwisted sector, the ring H S R ( P Σ , C )   is a direct sum of the modules H v   generated by the images in H S R ( P Σ , C )   of the elements [ v ] C [ N , Σ ]   for all v B o x ( Σ )   .
In the projective case, each of the modules H v   is isomorphic to the cohomology of the toric subvariety of P Σ   that corresponds to the minimum cone of Σ   that contains v   . Remarkably, this is true in general if one works in SR-cohomology with complex or rational coefficients.
Proposition 3.9. The module H v   is isomorphic to the SR-cohomology with complex coefficients of the (closed) toric subvariety of P Σ   that corresponds to the minimum cone of Σ   that contains v   .
Remark 3.10. Propositions  3.8 and  3.9 still hold for SR-cohomology with rational coefficients. The proofs are unchanged.
Remark 3.11. Suppose that the fan Σ   is projective, or that it is a subdivision of a cone. Under these assumptions, if one picks a basis { f j }   of N   , then the corresponding elements i = 1 n f ( v i ) [ v i ]   form a regular sequence in Q [ N ] Σ   . As a result, the graded dimension of H S R ( Σ , C )   , defined as d Q t d dim C H S R ( P Σ , C ) deg = d   , equals g r . d i m H S R ( P Σ , C ) = ( 1 t ) r k N n N Σ t deg ( n ) .   The proof of this regularity is sketched in [BCSfor the projective case and in [BMfor the cone case. In general, the graded dimension of H S R ( Σ , C )   is the sum over sectors of the graded dimensions of the SR-cohomology of the sector, but it lacks such a nice combinatorial formula.

4 K   -theory of reduced toric DM stacks

The goal of this section is to prove a combinatorial description of the K   -theory of reduced toric DM stack which is analogous to the Stanley-Reisner presentation of the cohomology of a smooth toric variety.
Analogous statements for smooth toric varieties are contained in
[Ba.
The resulting ring is then compared to the SR-cohomology of the stack.
We use the notations from the previous sections. We do not make any assumptions on the stacky fan apart from
 1 .
Definition 4.1. Let X   be a smooth Deligne-Mumford stack.
Define the (Grothendieck)
K   -theory group K 0 ( X )   to be the quotient of the free abelian group generated by coherent sheaves   on X   by the relations [ 1 ] [ 2 ] + [ 3 ]   for all exact sequences 0 1 2 3 0   .
Remark 4.2. The K   -theory of X   admits a product structure by [ 1 ] * [ 2 ] = i = 0 dim X ( 1 ) i [ T o r i ( 1 , 2 ) ] .   The image of the structure sheaf O   plays the role of the identity.
We recall that the category of coherent sheaves on [ Z / G ]   is equivalent to that of G   -linearized coherent sheaves on Z   , see [V,Example7.21. We will always implicitly use this equivalence.
Definition 4.3. For each i   from 1   to n   we define a G   -linearized invertible sheaf i   on Z   as follows. As a sheaf, it will be isomorphic to the structure sheaf O Z   . For g = ( λ 1 , , λ n ) G   the isomorphism O Z g * O Z = O Z   sends 1   to λ i   . Here we have used the canonical isomorphism g * O Z = O Z   . We define R i   to be the image of i   in the K   -theory of P Σ   .
Remark 4.4. The sheaf i   has a G   -invariant global section given by the restriction to Z   of the i   -th coordinate function z i   on C n   . Indeed, g * z i = λ i z i   , so z i   is compatible with the isomorphisms of the above definition. In the case of a smooth toric variety, i   corresponds to O ( D i )   where D i   is the divisor of the i   -th dimension one cone of Σ   .
Proposition 4.5. The elements R i   of K 0 ( P Σ )   satisfy the following relations.
Theorem 4.6. The elements R i   generate the K 0   -theory of the reduced toric DM stack P Σ   .
Corollary 4.8. The bounded derived category of the category of coherent sheaves on P Σ   is generated by the invertible sheaves i i r i   .
Remark 4.9. We refer the reader to [K2for much stronger results concerning these derived categories.
Theorem 4.10. Let B   be the quotient of the Laurent polynomial ring Z [ x 1 , x 1 1 , , x n , x n 1 ]   by the ideal generated by the relations
Then the map ρ : B K 0 ( P Σ )   which sends x i   to R i   is an isomorphism.

5 Combinatorial Chern character

In this section we study the K   -theory of the reduced toric DM stack P Σ   in more detail. More specifically, we show that K 0 ( P Σ , C ) : = K 0 ( P Σ ) Z C   is isomorphic as a vector space to H S R ( P Σ , C )   .
By Theorem
 4.10 , we have that K 0 ( P Σ , C ) = B C : = B Z C   . Its maximum ideals correspond to points ( y 1 , , y n ) C n   that satisfy i = 1 n y i f ( v i ) = 1   and i I ( 1 y i ) = 0   , for f   and I   in the definition of B   .
Lemma 5.1. The ring B C   is Artinian. Its maximum ideals are in one-to-one correspondence with the elements of B o x ( Σ )   as follows. A point v = v i C α i v i   corresponds to the n   -tuple ( y 1 , , y n ) C n   with y i = e 2 π i α i   for v i C   and y i = 1   otherwise.
Since B C   is Artinian, it is a direct sum of Artinian local rings obtained by localizing at maximum ideals, which we denote by ( B C ) v   . We have B C = v B o x ( Σ ) ( B C ) v   The next lemma describes the structure of ( B C ) v   .
Lemma 5.2. Let C   be the minimum cone of Σ   that contains v   . Then the ring ( B C ) v   is isomorphic as a C   -algebra to the SR-cohomology with complex coefficients of the (closed) subvariety of P Σ   that corresponds to C   .
Theorem 5.3. There is a natural vector space isomorphism between K 0 ( P Σ , C )   and H S R ( P Σ , C )   .
Remark 5.4. We call the map of Theorem  5.3  combinatorial Chern character. While it is an isomorphism of vector spaces, we stress that this map is not a ring homomorphism, since B C   is semilocal and H S R ( P Σ , C )   is local. One motivation behind our construction is that it generalizes the Chern character for projective toric varieties (which, however, is a ring isomorphism).
Remark 5.5. If P Σ   is projective, one can use the isomorphism of SRand orbifold cohomology to construct a map K 0 ( Σ , C ) H o r b ( P Σ , C )   . We suspect that this map is the Chern character map of [AR, which also motivated our terminology. But since our technique is quite different, we found it hard to make the connection explicit.
Remark 5.6. It is an interesting question as to under what conditions on the fan the K   -theory is torsion-free. We do not know the answer to this, even in the case of smooth toric varieties.
Remark 5.7. The additive isomorphism between K 0 ( P Σ , C )   and the SR-cohomology H S R ( N , Σ , C )   indicates that the K   -theory of a reduced toric DM stack possesses an alternative product structure that makes it into a local ring. One wonders what the geometric meaning of this structure may be. A related open question is whether there is a structure like this for the K   -theory of any DM stack, not necessarily a toric one.

6 The K   -theory of nonreduced toric DM stacks

In this section we extend the calculation of K   -theory of toric stacks to the nonreduced case. Since this is not the main focus of this paper, we only sketch the changes necessary to extend the results.
The principal feature of the nonreduced case is that
N   is now just a finitely generated abelian group, i.e. it is allowed to have torsion. A fan in N   is a pullback of a fan in N / t o r s i o n   . A stacky fan is defined by a choice of a nonzero element v i   in each of the one-dimensional cones of Σ   . We still have a map Z n N   with finite coindex. This allows one to define a Gale dual ( Z n ) N   which is the analog of ( Z n ) C o k e r φ   of Section  2 , but we no longer have the surjectivity. We refer the reader to [BCSfor the details.
Consequently, the group
G = H o m ( N , C )   is no longer a subgroup of ( C * ) n   , but rather maps to it with a finite kernel.
Otherwise, the definition of the open subset
Z C n   is the same as in the reduced case. This allows one to define line bundles i   on P Σ   .
Unfortunately, they will no longer generate the
K   -theory. The problem is that in the proof of Theorem  4.6 we have used that every character of G   lifts to a character of ( C * ) n   . This is no longer the case. However, we can still look at the ring B   which is the quotient of the character ring of G   by the relations i I ( x i 1 ) = 0   for all I [ 1 , , n ]   , such that v i , i I   are not contained in any cone of Σ   . Here x i   correspond to i   as in nonreduced case. With this modification, the proofs of both Theorems  4.6 and  4.10 are extended to the nonreduced case without any major changes to show that K 0 ( P Σ ) = B   .
The description of the maximum ideals of
B C   from Lemma  5.1 still holds in the nonreduced case, but the proof is a bit more complicated, especially is one does not assume the condition  4 . Specifically, these ideals correspond to elements of G   whose action on C n   has eigenvalues one outside of the set of indices i   for v i   in some cone C Σ   . So we have a morphism ψ : N C *   such that the composition ( Z n ) N C *   takes value one on the basis elements that correspond to v i   outside of C   . The value of ψ   on any element of N   is a root of one. Indeed, ψ G   fixes a point in Z   , and it has been shown in [BCSthat all isotropy subgroups of G   -action are finite. Consequently, we can think of ψ   as a map N Q / Z   . Conversely, every such ψ   gives rise to a group element with the above eigenvalue properties, and hence to a local subring of B C   .
We split
( Z n )   into ( Z dim C ) ( Z n dim C )   according to whether the corresponding basis elements lie in C   . Consider the short exact sequence of complexes
0 ( Z n dim C ) ( Z dim C ) ( Z n dim C ) ( Z dim C ) 0
0 N N 0 0
where we assume that the vertical lines are extended by zeroes in both directions. Gale duality with torsion (see [BCS) implies that N   can be canonically identified with the H 1   of the derived H o m ( * , Z )   of the middle complex. The above exact sequence shows that N / S p a n ( v i C )   is H 1   of the derived H o m ( ( Z n dim C ) N , Z )   .
We observe that
ψ : N Q / Z   constructed earlier can be identified with elements of H 0   of derived H o m ( ( Z n dim C ) N , Q / Z )   . The short exact sequence 0 Z Q Q / Z 0   yields an exact sequence H 0 ( H o m ( ( Z n dim C ) N , Z ) ) H 1 ( H o m ( ( Z n dim C ) N , Z ) )   H 1 ( H o m ( ( Z n dim C ) N , Q ) ) .   Since the last term of the above sequence is torsion free, the group H 0 ( H o m ( ( Z n dim C ) N , Z ) )   is precisely the torsion subgroup of N / S p a n ( v i C )   . Finally, elements of this torsion subgroup are in one-to-one correspondence with elements of B o x ( C )   . We leave to the reader to check that these identifications are compatible with embeddings B o x ( C 1 ) B o x ( C 2 )   for C 1 C 2   and that they coincide with the construction of Section  5 in the reduced case. The SR-cohomology of P Σ   is again given as the quotient of C [ N , Σ ]   by the linear relations i f ( v i ) [ v i ]   . Note that it is no longer a local ring, because of the graded zero part is the group ring of the torsion subgroup of N   . SR-cohomology again splits into the untwisted and twisted sectors according to elements of B o x ( Σ )   , and Propositions  3.8 and  3.9 still hold.
The combinatorial Chern character map of Theorem
 5.3 still exists in the nonreduced case. It sends the local subring of the Artinian ring B C   which corresponds to the point v B o x ( Σ )   to the SR-cohomology of the corresponding twisted sector. More specifically, let v   be this point and let C   be the minimum cone of Σ   that contains it. The map from G   to G   is a finite unramified cover, so the local ring summand for B C   is isomorphic to the local ring of a semi-local ring B C   which is obtained by cutting the character ring of G   by the same set of relations. Then the calculation of Lemma  5.2 shows that ( B C ) v = ( B C ) v   is isomorphic to the SR-cohomology of the twisted sector of the reduction of P Σ   that corresponds to the reduction of v   modulo torsion. However, this reduction does not change the coarse moduli space of the twisted sector, which finishes the construction of the isomorphism. The details are left to the reader.

7 Birational morphisms of reduced toric DM stacks

The statements of this section are implicit in [K1, but we adjust the exposition for our notations.
Let
N   be a lattice and let Σ = ( Σ , { v i } )   be a stacky fan in N   .
We will assume that every cone of
Σ   is contained in a cone of Σ   of dimension r k N   . As before, let n   be the number of v i   and let Z C n   consist of the points z = ( z 1 , , z n )   such that the set of v i   for the zero coordinates of z   is contained in a cone of Σ   . Let G   be the subgroup of ( C * ) n   described by  3 . The toric DM stack P Σ   is defined as the stack quotient [ Z / G ]   where Z   and G   are endowed with the natural reduced scheme structures and the action of ( λ i )   on ( z i )   is given by ( λ i z i )   .
Let
Σ = ( Σ , { v j } )   be another stacky fan in the same lattice N   . Let us further assume that every cone of Σ   is contained in a cone of Σ   . In particular, for every j   there is a unique way of writing v j   in the form v j = i α i , j v i , α i , j Q   under the assumption that α i , j   are zero unless v i   lies in the minimum cone of Σ   that contains v j   . Moreover, let us assume that all α i , j   above are integer.
Definition 7.1. Under the above assumptions, there is a morphism P Σ P Σ   defined as follows. Define a homomorphism ( C * ) n ( C * ) n   which sends ( λ j )   to ( j ( λ j ) α i , j )   . It is easy to see that this homomorphism sends points of G   to points of G   . We also consider the map from C n   to C n   which sends ( z j )   to ( j ( z j ) α i , j )   .
This map sends points in
Z   to points in Z   . Indeed, if the C   is a cone of Σ   that contains all v j   for which z j = 0   , then j ( z j ) α i , j   is nonzero unless v i   lies in the minimum cone of Σ   that contains C   . The map Z Z   is compatible with the map of groups G G   and their actions. This gives a map of quotient stacks, since one has the map between the corresponding groupoids.
Remark 7.2. We call the toric morphisms of Definition  7.1  birational, because they induce isomorphisms on the big strata ( C * ) r k N   in both stacks.

8 K   -theory pullbacks for birational morphisms

Let μ : P Σ , { v j } P Σ , { v i }   be a toric birational morphism of toric DM stacks. Let R i   be defined as the elements of K 0 ( P Σ , { v i } , Q )   that correspond to the invertible sheaves that correspond to v i   , and similarly for R j   . There is a pullback map μ * : K 0 ( P Σ , { v i } , Q ) K 0 ( P Σ , { v j } , Q )   defined by pulling back the coherent sheaves. As we saw earlier in Theorem  4.10 , the elements i R i r i   span K 0 ( P Σ , { v i } , Q )   .
Proposition 8.1. The pullback map μ *   is given by μ * i R i r i = j ( R j ) i α i , j r i  
Remark 8.2. It is an amusing, though unnecessary, combinatorial exercise to see that the relations among i R i r i   get mapped in the ideal of the relations among j ( R j ) r j   .

9 Weighted blowups and pushforward formulas

Let ( Σ , { v i } )   be a stacky fan in lattice N   . Let C   be a cone in Σ   of dimension d > 1   and let { v 1 , v d }   be the set of v i C   . Let h 1 , , h d   be some positive integers. Consider v 0 : = i = 1 d h i v i .   The cone C   decomposes into a union of d   cones of dimension d   which are given by positive linear combinations of v 0   and all but one of v i , 1 i d   .
We define a stacky fan
( Σ , { v j } )   as follows. We add an extra ray which corresponds to v 0   and keep the rest of v i   unchanged. Thus n = n + 1   and v i = v i   for i > 0   . Every cone C ^   of Σ   that does not contain C   is still a cone of Σ   . Every cone C ^ C   is subdivided into d   cones C 1 , , C d   according to the above decomposition of C   .
Our definitions assure that there is a birational morphism
μ : P Σ , { v j } P Σ , { v i }   which we call the weighted blowdown morphism. We will also denote by π   the corresponding morphism Z Z   . Our goal is to calculate the K   -theory pushforward of μ   . It is best described in terms of generating functions.
Theorem 9.1. Let R = R 0   be the K   -theory class of the invertible sheaf that corresponds to the extra ray v 0   . There holds μ * ( 1 1 R 1 t ) = 1 1 t t 1 t i 1 R i 1 1 R i 1 t h i   which should be interpreted as an identity of formal power series in t   with values in K   -theory.
Remark 9.2. The above theorem allows one to calculate the pushforward of any element of K   -theory in view of the description of the pullback in Proposition  8.1 and the pull-push formula. Indeed, every element of K 0 ( P Σ , { v i } )   can be written as a polynomial in R   and R 1   with coefficients in μ * K 0 ( P Σ , { v i } )   .
Since
R   is quasi-unipotent, it can be expressed in terms of negative powers of R   .
So far we have considered the weighted blowups of a stratum of codimension d > 1   . While blowups in codimension one are isomorphisms in the smooth variety case, this is no longer true for weighted blowups of stacks. Namely, let ( Σ , { v i } )   be a stacky fan in N   . Let C   be a dimension one cone of Σ   and let v 1   be the chosen lattice point on C   .
For a positive integer
k   consider the stacky fan ( Σ , { v i } )   defined by Σ = Σ   , v 1 = k v 1   , v i = v i , i > 1   . There is a birational morphism μ : P Σ , { v i } P Σ , { v i }   which we again call weighted blowdown morphism. To complete the discussion, we calculate the corresponding pushforward in K   -theory.
Since the pullback is given by
μ * R 1 = R 1 k   , μ * R i = R i   for i > 1   , it is enough to calculate the pushforward of R 1 m   for m = 1 , , k   .
Proposition 9.3. For 1 m k   we have μ * ( R 1 ) m = R 1 1   .
We rewrite the result of Proposition  9.3 to resemble that of Theorem  9.1 . We denote R = R 1   .
Corollary 9.4. For the blowdown of codimension one, μ * ( 1 1 R 1 t ) = 1 1 t t ( 1 t ) ( 1 R 1 1 ) ( 1 R 1 1 t k ) .  
References

  1. D. Abramovich, T. Graber, A. Vistoli, Algebraic orbifold quantum products, Orbifolds in mathematics and physics (Madison, WI, 2001), 1-24, Contemp. Math., 310, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.
  2. A. Adem, Y. Ruan, Twisted orbifold K   -theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 237 (2003), no. 3, 533–556.
  3. S. Baggio, Equivariant K-Theory of Smooth Toric Varieties, preprint math.AG/0410378.
  4. L. Borisov, L. Chen, G. Smith, The orbifold Chow ring of toric Deligne-Mumford stacks, preprint math.AG/0309229, to appear in J. Amer. Math. Soc.
  5. L. Borisov, R. P. Horja, GKZ systems, toric DM stacks and mirror symmetry, in preparation.
  6. L. Borisov, A. Mavlyutov, String cohomology of Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces via mirror symmetry, Adv. Math. 180 (2003), no. 1, 355–390.
  7. W. Chen, Y. Ruan, Orbifold Gromov-Witten theory, Orbifolds in mathematics and physics (Madison, WI, 2001), Contemporary Mathematics 310, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002, 25–85.
  8. D. Eisenbud, Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 150. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.
  9. W. Fulton, Introduction to toric varieties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 131. The William H. Roever Lectures in Geometry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993.
  10. R. Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 52. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1977.
  11. T. J. Jarvis, R. Kaufmann, T. Kimura, Stringy K-theory and the Chern character, preprint math.AG/0502280.
  12. Y. Kawamata, Log Crepant Birational Maps and Derived Categories, preprint math.AG/0311139.
  13. Y. Kawamata, Derived Categories of Toric Varieties, preprint math.AG/0503102.
  14. G. Mumford, J. Fogarty, Geometric invariant theory. Second edition, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas], 34. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.
  15. A. Vistoli, Intersection theory on algebraic stacks and on their moduli spaces, Invent. Math. 97 (1989), no. 3, 613–670.

Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, borisov@math.wisc.edu, The Fields Institute, 222 College St, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3J1, Canada, horja@fields.utoronto.ca.