2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14K05, 1K412, 14J17, 14F17.Olivier Debarre was visiting the University of Michigan when part of this work was done, with support from William Fulton and Robert Lazarsfeld. Christopher Hacon was partially supported by NSA research grant no: MDA904-03-1-0101 and by a grant from the Sloan Foundation.
Singularities of divisors of low degree on abelian varieties
Olivier Debarre and Christopher Hacon
Mathematique – IRMA – UMR 7501, Universite Louis Pasteur, 7, rue Rene Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France E-mail address : debarre@math.u-strasbg.fr URL: http://www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/
debarre Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 155 South 1400 East, Room 233, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA E-mail address : hacon@math.utah.edu URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/
hacon
-
Abstract.
Building on previous work of Kollár, Ein, Lazarsfeld, and Hacon, we show that ample divisors of low degree on an abelian variety have mild singularities in case the abelian variety is simple or the degree of the polarization is two.
1 Introduction
Since Kollár used in [Ko1] the Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing theorem to settle classical conjectures about singularities of theta divisors in complex principally polarized abelian varieties, the subject has known spectacular developments. Ein and Lazarsfeld, using generic vanishing theorems of Green and Lazarsfeld, proved in [EL] that irreducible theta divisors are normal and gave an optimal bound on the dimension of the locus of points of given multiplicity of a multitheta divisor. Hacon determined in [H1] exactly when this bound is attained and obtained in [H2] results for ample divisors of degree
.
In this article, we investigate more generally abelian varieties with an indecomposable polarization of degree smaller than the dimension.
When the degree increases, many special cases begin to appear, often due to the presence of reducible divisors that represent the polarization.
In order to avoid overly technical statements, we restrict ourselves to two cases: the case where the ambient abelian variety is simple, and the case of polarizations of degree
(thereby completing Hacon's above-mentioned results). Although we obtained almost complete results for polarizations of degree
, we chose not to inflict their very technical proofs on the unsuspecting reader.
We refer to Theorems 3 , 4 , 6 , and 7 for more precise formulations and quote only the following results. Let
be a polarized abelian variety of degree
and dimension
, and let
be any effective divisor that represents
, with
.
Assume
is simple and
. If
, the divisor
is normal and has rational singularities; if
, the set of points of multiplicity at least
on
has codimension
in
.
When
and
is only indecomposable, similar conclusions hold. Moreover, the set of points of multiplicity at least
on
has codimension
in
if and only if
is a double étale cover of a product of at least
nonzero principally polarized abelian varieties.
The proofs of these results systematically use generic vanishing theorems and precise descriptions of cohomological loci attached to various situations (see § 4 ). We work over the complex numbers.
2 Singularities of pairs
We just need a quick review of the basic terminology relative to the singularities of a pair
consisting of an effective
-divisor
in a smooth projective variety
.
A log resolution of the pair
is a proper birational morphism
such that the union of
and the exceptional locus of
is a divisor with simple normal crossing support. Write
where the
are distinct prime divisors on
. The pair
is
-
log canonical if
for all
;
-
log terminal if
for all
;
-
canonical if
for all
such that
is
-exceptional;
for some log resolution
. The multiplier ideal sheaf associated to the pair
is
One sees that
| |
| |
Assume now that
is a prime divisor in
. The adjoint ideal sheaf
is defined in [EL] , Proposition 3.1. For any desingularization
, it fits into an exact sequence
|
(1)
|
of sheaves on
and ([EL] , Proposition 3.1; [Ko2] , Corollary 7.9.2, Theorem 7.9, and Theorem (11.1.1))
| |
| |
Furthermore, for any positive integers
and
, we have
| |
|
(2)
|
| |
(The pair
is log terminal only when
.)
3 Polarized abelian varieties
Let
be an abelian variety of dimension
. Any line bundle
on
induces a morphism
defined by
, where
is the translation
. This morphism only depends on the numerical equivalence class
of
and will also be denoted by
. We denote its kernel by
or
. If
is a divisor on
, we write
for
and
for
. The line bundle
is ample if and only if
is finite, in which case this group has order
, where
is the degree of
. A polarization on
is a numerical equivalence class of ample line bundles on
. A polarization of degree
is called principal and a divisor representing it is called a theta divisor. A polarization
is of type
if
. If
is prime, any polarization of degree
is of type
.
A polarized abelian variety
is indecomposable if it is not the product of nonzero polarized abelian varieties. If
, a general element of
is then prime.
4 Cohomological loci in
Let
be an abelian variety. For any coherent sheaf
on
and integer
, we define reduced subvarieties of
by setting
| |
| |
We investigate the geometry of these loci when
is the tensor product of an ample line bundle with an ideal sheaf.
Lemma 1.
Let
be an ample line bundle of degree
on an abelian variety
of dimension
, with base locus
, and let
be a subscheme of
, with ideal sheaf
. Set
and
for
general in
. We have the following.
-
a)
For
, the set
is empty.
-
b)
If
, the set
is nonempty.
-
c)
We have
, and
if and only if
is empty.
-
d)
If
, and if the polarized abelian variety
is indecomposable, the scheme
is finite and either
, or
is a single (reduced) point
and
, so that
.
-
e)
If
is simple and
, we have
and
.
Note that
for
.
-
Proof.
For
, we have
for all
. This proves a).
If
is empty,
for all
. If
, we have
for all integers
and all
. This is impossible by [M] , Corollary 2.4, and b) is proved.
We have
if and only if all sections of
vanish on general translates of
; this happens if and only if
is empty. This proves c). Let us now prove d). Set
The fiber of a point
of
for the second projection
is isomorphic to
. If
, a unique irreducible component
of
dominates
, and
.
Let
be the first projection. Since any nonempty
satisfies
, we have
Assume
. Then
is surjective and
has dimension
. The divisor of a general section
being prime, the inclusion
is an equality for all
in
. This implies that
is finite. If
, the length of
is
, so that
, and an element
of
satisfies
if and only if the restriction
is not surjective; in other words, if all sections of
vanish at
, i.e. ,
. This proves d).
Assume
is simple and
. Then
is nonempty and the inclusion
implies ([D2] , Corollaire 2.7)
For
general in
, the subvariety
of
is a linear subspace of dimension
. It must vary with
, because a nonzero
does not vanish on all translates of
. It follows that the linear span of
has dimension at least
. For
general elements in
, one has ([D2] , Corollaire 2.4)
For
, the sections
all vanish on
, hence
. This implies
and proves e). □
Assume now that there is a smooth variety
with a morphism
such that the sheaf
on
is a direct summand of
.
Let
be an abelian variety with a morphism
. For all integers
and
, and any torsion point
, every irreducible component of
is an abelian subvariety of
of codimension at least
translated by a torsion point. This applies in particular to the loci
in
.
When
, this is a particular case of [HP] , Theorem 2.2. For the general case, associate to the torsion element
a cyclic étale cover
. Then
is a direct summand of
, hence
is a direct summand of
.
Lemma 2.
Under the hypotheses and notation of Lemma 1 , assume further that there is an exact sequence
for some
, where
is a direct summand of a pushforward of a dualizing sheaf. The following properties hold.
-
a)
Every irreducible component of
is an abelian subvariety of
of codimension at least
translated by a torsion point.
-
b)
If the support of
is not contained in any nonample divisor of
, we have, for any
such that
is nonempty,
.
-
Proof.
Since
, item a) holds. Let us prove b). Since b) follows from Lemma 1 .a) when
is finite, we may pick a common irreducible component
of
and of
of maximal positive dimension. Let
and let
be the induced morphism. Let
be a torsion point such that
.
We know that
has codimension at least
in
. It follows that for general
, and all
and
,
hence
|
(3)
|
because
is in
. We have an exact sequence
The sheaves
are direct sums of numerically trivial line bundles on
(this follows from the proof of [Ke] , Theorem 1). By a result of Kollár ([Ko3] , Theorem 3.4; [HP] , Theorem 2.1), the sheaf
is torsion-free on
, which is
by hypothesis. It follows that the support of the sheaf
is
: if it is not, the map
is generically injective, hence injective; but a twist of
by a general
has no nonzero section, contradicting ( 3 ).
Since
, the short exact sequence
yields a surjection
hence the support of
is also
. In particular, all fibers of
have dimension at least
, and b) follows. □
5 Singularities of ample divisors in abelian varieties
This section contains the central results of this article. Let
be a polarized abelian variety. We study the singularities of a divisor in
, with
, when the dimension is large enough with respect to the degree.
Theorem 3.
Let
be a simple polarized abelian variety of degree
and dimension
.
-
a)
Every divisor in
is prime, normal, and has rational singularities.
-
b)
If
and
is a divisor in
, the pair
is log terminal unless
, with
.
For polarizations of degree
, these results can be improved: we can drop the assumption that
be simple.
Theorem 4 (Degrees
and
).
Let
be an indecomposable polarized abelian variety of degree
and dimension
.
-
a)
If
, every prime divisor in
is normal and has rational singularities.
Let
be a divisor in
, with
.
-
b)
If
, the pair
is log canonical.
-
c)
If
and
, the pair
is log terminal.
Note that
may very well contain reducible elements (see § 6 ). As to c), we explain in Corollary 10 when the assumption
fails to hold.
-
Proof of the theorems.
We set up the notation in order to give a uniform presentation for all cases.
Let
be an ample line bundle on
that represents
, let
be a prime divisor in
, and let
be the adjoint ideal
.
Let also
, for
, be the multiplier ideal
.
We have:
| |
| |
| |
We set as above, for
general in
,
The point is to prove
(Lemma 1 .c)). Note that in case b) of Theorem 3 , we may assume
(Corollary 10 .a)) and that in case b) of Theorem 4 , we have
(Corollary 10 .b)).
Case
. It follows from the Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing theorem that
is empty ([E] , Proposition 1.4), hence
(Lemma 1 .b)). If
is simple and
, Lemma 1 .e) yields
. If
and
is indecomposable, we have
since
(Lemma 1 .d)), hence
again. This proves Theorems 3 and 4 in that case.
Case
. We have
, i.e. ,
, because
is not fibered by (nonzero) abelian varieties ([EL] , Theorem 3). Moreover, the exact sequence ( 1 ) shows that Lemma 2 applies with
and
with support
.
Case
. In this case,
is a direct summand of the pushforward of a dualizing sheaf,1
so that Lemma 2 applies with
. Moreover, since
and
, following the proof of [H1] , Theorem 1, one obtains
.
So we may assume
,
, and that the conclusions of Lemma 2 hold.
If
is simple,
is finite, and Lemma 1 .e) implies Theorem 3 .
We now prove Theorem 4 . Since
, we need only consider the case
.
If
, since
has codimension at least
, the scheme
is a single point and
has dimension
(Lemma 1 .d)).
This contradicts the fact that
has dimension
(Lemma 2 .b)).
Hence
and Theorem 4 is proved. □
In view of the above results and further investigations, it is natural to make the following conjecture.
Conjecture 5.
Let
be a simple polarized abelian variety of degree
and dimension
.
-
a)
Every divisor in
is prime, normal, and has rational singularities.
-
b)
For any divisor
in
, with
, the pair
is log terminal unless
, with
.
We can prove the conjecture for
. For
, we can prove that the pair
is log terminal when
is general. For
, we can prove that the pair
is log canonical when
is simple.
However, because of the technical nature of our arguments, we do not pursue this here.
We now interpret our results in terms of dimensions of loci of singularities.
Theorem 6.
Let
be a simple polarized abelian variety of degree
and dimension
. Let
and
be positive integers. For all
, we have
unless
and
, with
.
-
Proof.
According to Theorem 3 , the hypotheses imply that the pair
is canonical for
and the pair
is log terminal for
, unless
, with
. Since the pair
is then also canonical, the theorem follows from ( 2 ). □
In the case of a polarization of degree
, we get a more precise result, analogous to [EL] , Corollary 2, and [H1] , Corollary 2.
Theorem 7.
Let
be an indecomposable polarized abelian variety of degree
and dimension
and let
and
be positive integers. The following properties are equivalent:
-
(i)
for some
in
, the locus
contains an irreducible component of codimension
in
;
-
(ii)
the polarized abelian variety
is a double étale cover of a product of
nonzero principally polarized abelian varieties.
-
Proof.
If (ii) holds, the polarization is represented by an étale cover of the theta divisor of a product of
nonzero principally polarized abelian varieties, hence (i) holds.
Assume (i). By Theorem 4 .c) and ( 2 ),
must have a component of multiplicity at least
. If
, with
prime, the pair
is canonical (Theorem 4 .b)) and by ( 2 ), this contradicts (i).
Therefore, by Corollary 10 .b), there are nonzero principally polarized abelian varieties
and
and an isogeny
such that
where
.
If
is a component of
of maximal dimension, there is an integer
such that
From [Ko1] , Theorem 17.1, we get
From [EL] , Proposition 3.5, we get
Since
has codimension
, both inequalities must be equalities. By [EL] , Corollary 2,
splits as a product of
nonzero principally polarized abelian varieties, and by [H1] , Corollary 2,
splits as the product of at least
principally polarized abelian varieties, so that (ii) holds. □
6 Reducible divisors in indecomposable polarizations
We gather in this last section elementary results on polarized abelian varieties that were used earlier.
Lemma 8.
Let
be an indecomposable polarized abelian variety. If the restriction of
to an abelian subvariety
of
is principal, either
or
.
-
Proof.
Let
be the neutral component of the kernel of
The sum map
is an isogeny of polarized abelian varieties whose kernel is isomorphic to
. Since
induces a principal polarization on
, the restriction of
to
is injective, i.e. ,
and
is injective. □
We now study indecomposable polarizations that contain nonprime divisors. The situation is manageable when
is simple or the degree is
. For degrees at least
, more and more exceptional cases arise.
Proposition 9.
Let
be an indecomposable polarized abelian variety of degree
and dimension
such that
contains a nonprime divisor
.
a) The abelian variety
is not simple.
b) If
, there exist a decomposable principally polarized abelian variety
and an isogeny
of degree
such that
.
-
Proof.
Write
, with
and
effective and nonzero, and let, for
,
,
, and
.
Since
is contained in
, it is finite, hence
. There is an ample divisor
on
which pulls back to
, and
The first term of this sum is
| |
| |
and similarly for the last term, hence all terms are positive2
integers.
When
is simple, we have
, hence
. This proves a).
We now assume
and prove b). By Lemma 8 ,
does not restrict to a principal polarization on
unless
, i.e. ,
. The only possibility is
, the polarization
on
is principal, the map
is an isogeny, and
. □
We use these results to bound the multiplicities of the components of elements of
.
Corollary 10.
Let
be an indecomposable polarized abelian variety of degree
and dimension
and let
, with
.
-
a)
If
is simple, we have
. Moreover,
unless
, with
.
-
b)
If
, we have
. Moreover,
unless
, with
prime, or there are nonzero principally polarized abelian varieties
and
, and an isogeny
of degree
, such that
with
.
-
Proof.
The arguments of the proofs of Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3 of [H1] yield:
-
, unless
contains a reducible divisor of the form
, with
ample and
,
, and
effective nonzero;
-
, unless
contains a divisor of the form
, with
,
, and
effective.
The corollary therefore follows from the proposition. □
Remark 11.
Polarized abelian varieties that satisfy the condition in Proposition 9 .b) are all obtained as follows. Let
be any positive integer and, for
, let
be a nonzero principally polarized abelian variety of dimension
.
Endow
with the product polarization
. Choose a point
in
of order
and consider the cyclic isogeny
of degree
associated with the point
of
. The divisor
is reducible and defines a polarization
of type
on
.
Let
be the degree
cyclic isogeny associated with
and let
be the polarization
(of type
) induced on
. There is a factorization
Another way to construct
is to start from nonzero polarized abelian varieties
and
of type
, to choose elements
and
or order
, and to take the quotient of
by the subgroup generated by
. For more details, see [
D1]
, Proposition 9.1.
Assume
is prime. A polarized abelian variety of degree
is decomposable if and only if it has a nonzero principally polarized abelian factor. It follows that the polarized abelian variety
obtained by the above construction is indecomposable if and only if both polarized abelian varieties
and
are indecomposable.
References
-
Debarre, O., Sur les variétés abéliennes dont le diviseur thêta est singulier en codimension
, Duke Math. J. 57 (1988), 221–273.
-
Debarre, O., Théorèmes de connexité et variétés abéliennes, Amer. J. Math. 117 (1995), 787–805.
-
Ein, L., Multiplier ideals, vanishing theorems and applications, Algebraic geometry—Santa Cruz 1995, 203–219, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 62, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997.
-
Ein, L., Lazarsfeld, R., Singularities of theta divisors and the birational geometry of irregular varieties, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1997), 243–258.
-
Esnault, H., Viehweg, E., Lectures on vanishing theorems, DMV Seminar 20, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1992.
-
Hacon, C., Divisors on principally polarized abelian varieties, Comp. Math. 119 (1999), 321–329.
-
Hacon, C., Fourier transforms, generic vanishing theorems and polarizations of abelian varieties, Math. Zeit. 235 (2000), 717–726.
-
Hacon, C., Pardini, R., Birational characterization of products of curves of genus
, Math. Research Letters 12 (2005), 129–140.
-
Kempf, G., appendix to: Mumford, D., Varieties defined by quadratic equations.1970 Questions on Algebraic Varieties (C.I.M.E., III Ciclo, Varenna, 1969), 29–100, Edizioni Cremonese, Rome.
-
Kollár, J., Shafarevich maps and automorphic forms, M. B. Porter Lectures. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995.
-
Kollár, J., Singularities of pairs, Algebraic geometry—Santa Cruz 1995, 221–287, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 62, Part 1, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997.
-
Kollár, J., Higher direct images of dualizing sheaves II, Ann. of Math. 124 (1986), 171–202.
-
Mukai, S., Duality between
and
with its application to Picard sheaves, Nagoya Math. J. 81 (1981), 153–175.
Mathematique – IRMA – UMR 7501, Universite Louis Pasteur, 7, rue Rene Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France E-mail address : debarre@math.u-strasbg.fr URL: http://www-irma.u-strasbg.fr/
debarre Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 155 South 1400 East, Room 233, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA E-mail address : hacon@math.utah.edu URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/
hacon