Mirror Congruence For Rational Points On Calabi-Yau Varieties

Lei Fu Institute of Mathematics, Nankai University, Tianjin, P. R. China leifu@nankai.edu.cn Daqing Wan Institute of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697 dwan@math.uci.edu

0. Introduction One of the basic problems in arithmetic mirror symmetry is to compare the number of rational points on a mirror pair of Calabi-Yau varieties. At present, no general algebraic geometric definition is known for a mirror pair. But an important class of mirror pairs comes from certain quotient construction. In this paper, we study the congruence relation for the number of rational points on a quotient mirror pair of varieties over finite fields. Our main result is the following theorem:
Theorem 0.1. Let X 0   be a smooth projective variety over the finite field F q   with q   elements of characteristic p   . Suppose X 0   has a smooth projective lifting X   over the Witt ring W = W ( F q )   such that the W   -modules H r ( X , Ω X / W s )   are free. Let G   be a finite group of W   -automorphisms acting on the right of X   . Suppose G   acts trivially on H i ( X , O X )   for all i   . Then for any natural number k   , we have the congruence # X 0 ( F q k ) ≡ # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) ( m o d q k ) ,   where # X 0 ( F q k )   (resp. # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k )   ) denotes the number of elements of the sets of F q k   -rational points of X 0   (resp. X 0 / G   ).
The main application of the above theorem is to Calabi-Yau varieties. This gives the following theorem announced in [W], which was the main motivation of the present paper.
Theorem 0.2. Let X 0   be a geometrically connected smooth projective Calabi-Yau variety of dimension n   over the finite field F q   with q   elements of characteristic p   .
Suppose X 0   has a smooth projective lifting X   over the Witt ring W = W ( F q )   such that the W   -modules H r ( X , Ω X / W s )   are free. Let G   be a finite group of W   -automorphisms acting on the right of X   . Suppose G   fixes a non-zero n   -form on X   . Then for any natural number k   , we have the congruence # X 0 ( F q k ) ≡ # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) ( m o d q k ) .   Proof. If X   is a Calabi-Yau scheme over W   of dimension n   , then H i ( X , O X ) = 0   for i ≠ 0 , n   and G   acts trivially on them. If the generic fiber of X   is geometrically connected, then G   acts trivially on H 0 ( X , O X )   . By Serre duality, H n ( X , O X )   is dual to H 0 ( X , Ω X / W n )   . Since X   is Calabi-Yau, Ω X / W n   is a trivial invertible sheaf. In order for G   to act trivially on H n ( X , O X / W )   , it suffices for G   to fix a nonzero n   -form.
Theorem 0.2 thus follows from Theorem 0.1.
In particular, we have the following corollary:
Corollary 0.3. Let X 0   be the smooth ( n − 1 )   -dimensional hypersurface x 0 n + 1 + ⋯ + x n n + 1 + λ x 0 ⋯ x n = 0   in P F q n   , where λ ∈ F q   . Let G = { ( ζ 0 , … , ζ n ) | ζ i ∈ F q , ζ i n + 1 = 1 , n ∏ i = 0 ζ i = 1 } .   Consider the action G × X 0 → X 0   defined by ( ζ 0 , … , ζ n ) × [ x 0 : … : x n ] ↦ [ ζ 0 x 0 : … : ζ n x n ] .   We have # X 0 ( F q k ) ≡ # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) ( m o d q k )   for any natural number k   .
It is well known that the above hypersurface is Calabi-Yau. A G   -equivariant nonzero ( n − 1 )   -form is ( − 1 ) i d x 0 ∧ ⋯ ∧ d x i ^ ∧ ⋯ ∧ d x n 1 + ∑ j ≠ i x j n + 1 − λ ∏ j ≠ i x j   on the affine space x i = 1   of P n   .
It is known that for the above hypersurface X 0   , X 0 / G   is a strong singular mirror of X 0   if ( n + 1 ) | ( q − 1 )   . It is conjectured in [W] that for a strong mirror pair of Calabi-Yau varieties { X 0 , X 0 ′ }   over the finite field F q   , we have # X 0 ( F q k ) ≡ # X 0 ′ ( F q k ) ( m o d q k )   for any integer k   . See [W] for a fuller discussion on this and other arithmetic mirror conjectures. In the situation of Theorem 0.2, if X / G   is a singular mirror of X   and if Y   is a smooth crepant resolution of X / G   , then the pair ( X , Y )   forms a strong mirror pair of smooth projective Calabi-Yau varieties. The congruence mirror conjecture in this case then reduces to showing the congruence # ( X / G ) ( F q k ) ≡ # Y ( F q k ) ( m o d q k ) .   Another application of the theorem is to geometrically connected varieties with the property H i ( X , O X ) = 0   for all i ≠ 0   . Again in this case, G   acts trivially on H i ( X , O X )   for all i   . Let K ¯   be the algebraic closure of the fraction field of W = W ( F q )   . By [E], if the l   -adic cohomology group H i ( X ⊗ W K ¯ , Q l )   satisfies the coniveau 1 condition for each i ≠ 0   , that is, if any cohomology class in H i ( X ⊗ W K ¯ , Q l )   vanishes in H i ( U , Q l )   when restricted to some nonempty open U ⊂ X ⊗ W K ¯   , then we have H i ( X , O X ) = 0   for all i ≠ 0   . The converse is true if we assume the generalized Hodge conjecture. It turns out that in this case, we can prove a theorem stronger than Theorem 0.1. We don't need to assume X 0   can be lifted to W   .
Theorem 0.4. Let X 0   be a smooth geometrically connected projective variety over the finite field F q   . Suppose H i ( X 0 , O X 0 ) = 0   for all i ≠ 0   . Then for any natural number k   , we have # X 0 ( F q k ) ≡ 1 ( m o d q k ) .   Let G   be a finite group of F q   -automorphisms acting on the right of X 0   . We have # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) ≡ # X 0 ( F q k ) ≡ 1 ( m o d q k ) .   Acknowledgements. Our proof is based on crystalline cohomology and the Mazur-Ogus theorem. H. Esnault informed us that the results of the present paper can also be derived using de Rham-Witt cohomology and rigid cohomology. The research of Lei Fu is supported by the Qiushi Science & Technologies Foundation, by the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation, by the Transcentury Training Program Foundation, by the Project 973, and by the SRFDP. The research of Daqing Wan is partially supported by NSF. Part of this work is done while Lei Fu is visiting the University of California at Irvine. He would like to thank the Mathematics Department for its hospitality. 1. Proof of the Theorems First we introduce some notations. For any smooth proper scheme X 0   over F q   , let H i ( X 0 / W )   be the crystalline cohomology group of X 0   . It is a finitely generated module over the Witt ring W = W ( F q )   . Denote by F : X 0 → X 0   the Frobenius correspondence, that is, it is the identity map on the underlying topological space of X 0   , and it maps a section of O X 0   to its q   -th power.
Let κ   be a field and let Z   be a scheme over κ   . Denote by | Z |   the set of Zariski closed points in Z   . For any z ∈ | Z |   , define d e g ( z ) = [ k ( z ) : κ ]   , where k ( z )   is the residue field at z   . Let f : Z → Z   be a κ   -endomorphism with isolated fixed points.
Set Z f = { z ∈ | Z | | f ( z ) = z a n d f i n d u c e s i d e n t i t y o n k ( z ) } ,   and define Λ ( f ) = ∑ z ∈ Z f d e g ( z ) .   Let κ ′   be a field extending κ   and let f ′ : Z ⊗ κ κ ′ → Z ⊗ κ κ ′   be the base change of f   . Then we have Λ ( f ) = Λ ( f ′ )   .
Lemma 1.1. Let X 0   be a smooth projective variety over the finite field F q   , let g : X 0 → X 0   be an F q   -automorphism of finite order, and let K = F r a c W   be the fraction field of W = W ( F q )   . Then T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )   and T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )   are algebraic integers for any positive integer k   and any i   , and
Λ ( F k ) = ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ,
Λ ( g F k ) = ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) .
Proof. Let l   be a prime number distinct from p   . By Deligne's theorem ([D] 3.3.9), T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 ⊗ F q F ¯ q , Q ¯ l ) )   are algebraic integers. By the comparison theorem of Katz-Messing ([KM]), we have T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) = T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 ⊗ F q F ¯ q , Q ¯ l ) ) .   So T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )   are algebraic integers. The formula for Λ ( F k )   follows from the Lefschetz fixed point formula in crystalline cohomology theory ([B] Théorème VII 3.1.9).
We will reduce the statements about g F k   to the corresponding statements for F k   . Suppose g : X 0 → X 0   has finite order m   . Let X 1 = X 0 × S p e c F q S p e c F q m   , and let φ ∈ G a l ( F q m / F q )   be the Frobenius substitution. For any σ ∈ G a l ( F q m / F q )   , we have σ = φ k   for some integer k   uniquely determined modulo m   . Define f σ : X 1 → X 1   to be the isomorphism of schemes f σ = ( i d X 0 × σ * ) ∘ ( g − k × i d S p e c F q m ) : X 0 × S p e c F q S p e c F q m → X 0 × S p e c F q S p e c F q m .   Note that f σ   is independent of the choice of k   since g   has order m   . Since g − k × i d S p e c F q m   is an F q m   -morphism of X 1   , the following diagram commutes:
X 1 → f σ X 1
↓ ↓
S p e c F q m → σ * S p e c F q m .
Moreover we have f τ f σ = f σ τ   for any σ , τ ∈ G a l ( F q m / F q )   . By the theory of galois descent, ([S] Chapter V, No. 20, or Corollarie 7.7 in [SGA 1] Exposé VIII), there exists a scheme X 0 ′   over S p e c F q   such that we have an F q m   -isomorphism X 1 ∼ = X 0 ′ × S p e c F q S p e c F q m   and the following diagrams commute:
X 1 → f σ X 1
∼ = ↓ ↓ ∼ =
X 0 ′ × S p e c F q S p e c F q m → i d X 0 ′ × σ * X 0 ′ × S p e c F q S p e c F q m .
For any scheme Z   of characteristic p   , let F Z : Z → Z   be the Frobenius correspondence, that is, F Z   is identity on the underlying topological space and the morphism of sheaves F Z ♯ : O Z → F Z * O Z   maps each section to its q   -th power. On X 1 = X 0 × S p e c F q S p e c F q m   , we have
F X 1 = ( i d X 0 × φ * ) ∘ ( F X 0 × i d S p e c F q m ) = f φ ∘ ( g × i d S p e c F q m ) ∘ ( F X 0 × i d S p e c F q m )
= f φ ∘ ( g F X 0 × i d S p e c F q m ) .
Through the isomorphism X 1 ∼ = X 0 ′ × S p e c F q S p e c F q m   , F X 1   is identified with ( i d X 0 ′ × φ * ) ∘ ( F X 0 ′ × i d S p e c F q m )   . Moreover, the commutative diagram above shows that f φ   is identified with i d X 0 ′ × φ *   . So the morphism g F X 0 × i d S p e c F q m   on X 0 × F q F q m   is identified with the morphism F X 0 ′ × i d S p e c F q m   on X 0 ′ × S p e c F q F q m   . So we have
T r ( g F X 0 × i d F q m , H i ( X 0 × F q F q m / W ( F q m ) ) ⊗ W ( F q m ) F r a c ( W ( F q m ) ) )
= T r ( F X 0 ′ × i d F q m , H i ( X 0 ′ × F q F q m / W ( F q m ) ) ⊗ W ( F q m ) F r a c ( W ( F q m ) ) ) .
By the base change theorem in crystalline cohomology theory ([B] Corollaire V 3.5.7), we have
T r ( g F X 0 , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )
= T r ( g F X 0 × i d F q m , H i ( X 0 × F q F q m / W ( F q m ) ) ⊗ W ( F q m ) F r a c ( W ( F q m ) ) ) ,
T r ( F X 0 ′ , H i ( X 0 ′ / W ) ⊗ W K )
= T r ( F X 0 ′ × i d F q m , H i ( X 0 ′ × F q F q m / W ( F q m ) ) ⊗ W ( F q m ) F r a c ( W ( F q m ) ) ) .
So we have T r ( g F X 0 , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) = T r ( F X 0 ′ , H i ( X 0 ′ / W ) ⊗ W K ) .   In particular, T r ( g F X 0 , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )   are algebraic integers for all i   . Moreover, we have
Λ ( g F X 0 ) = Λ ( g F X 0 × i d S p e c F q m )
= Λ ( F X 0 ′ × i d S p e c F q m )
= Λ ( F X 0 ′ )
= ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( F X 0 ′ , H i ( X 0 ′ / W ) ⊗ W K )
= ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( g F X 0 , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) .
This proves the statements for g F   . To prove the statements for g F k   , we use the base change from F q   to F q k   .
Lemma 1.2. Under the condition of Theorem 0.1, we have T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ≡ T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ( m o d q k )   for all i   .
Proof. Let H i = H i ( X 0 / W )   . Recall that H i   can be identified with the de Rham cohomology of the lifting X   of X 0   to W = W ( F q )   . (Confer [B] Théorème V 2.3.2).
On H i   , we have the Hodge filtration H i = F 0 H i ⊃ F 1 H i ⊃ ⋯   and this filtration is G   stable. By a result of Mazur (the property (8.2) on page 65 of [M]), we have F ( F 1 H i ) ⊂ q H i .   We have H i / F 1 H i = F 0 H i / F 1 H i ∼ = H i ( X , O X ) .   Choose a basis { e 1 , … , e s }   of F 1 H i   and extend it to a basis { e 1 , … , e s , e s + 1 , … , e s + t }   of H i   . Since F k ( F 1 H i ) ⊂ q k H i   , the matrix of F k   on H i   with respect to the above basis is of the form ( q k A q k B C D ) ,   where A   is an s × s   matrix, B   is an s × t   matrix, C   is a t × s   matrix, and D   is a t × t   matrix. Since G   acts trivially on H i / F 1 H i ∼ = H i ( X , O X )   and G   preserves the Hodge filtration, the matrix of g ∈ G   on H i   with respect to the above basis is of the form ( P O Q I ) ,   where P   is an s × s   matrix, O   is the s × t   zero matrix, Q   is a t × s   matrix, and I   is the t × t   identity matrix. So the matrix of g F k   is ( q k A q k B C D ) ( P O Q I ) = ( q k A P + q k B Q q k B C P + D Q D ) .   We have T r ( g F k , H i ) = T r ( q k A P + q k B Q ) + T r ( D ) .   On the other hand, we have T r ( F k , H i ) = T r ( q k A ) + T r ( D ) .   So we have T r ( g F k , H i ) ≡ T r ( F k , H i ) ( m o d q k ) .   This finishes the proof of Lemma 1.2.
Lemma 1.3. Let X 0   be a quasi-projective scheme over F q   , let G   be a finite group acting on the right of X 0   . Then for any natural number k   , we have # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) = 1 # G ∑ g ∈ G Λ ( g F k ) .   Proof. This result is well known. We include a proof here for completeness. Let Y 0 = X 0 / G   , and let | X 0 |   (resp. | Y 0 |   ) be the set of Zariski closed point in X 0   (resp.
Y 0   ). For any x ∈ | X 0 |   , define the decomposition subgroup at x   by G d ( x ) = { g ∈ G | g x = x }   and the inertia subgroup at x   by G i ( x ) = { g ∈ G d ( x ) | g i n d u c e s i d e n t i t y o n t h e r e s i d u e f i e l d k ( x ) a t x } .   Let y   be the image of x   in Y 0   . By Proposition 1.1 in Exposé V of [SGA 1], we have an isomorphism G d ( x ) / G i ( x ) ∼ = G a l ( k ( x ) / k ( y ) ) ,   and for any y ∈ | Y 0 |   , there are exactly # G # G d ( x )   Zariski closed points in X 0   above y   and each of these closed points has degree d e g ( y ) # G d ( x ) # G i ( x )   . We have
# Y 0 ( F q k ) = ∑ y ∈ | Y 0 | , d e g ( y ) | k d e g ( y )
= 1 # G ∑ y ∈ | Y 0 | , d e g ( y ) | k # G # G d ( x ) # G d ( x ) # G i ( x ) # G i ( x ) d e g ( y )
= 1 # G ∑ y ∈ | Y 0 | , d e g ( y ) | k ∑ x ∈ | X 0 | , x ↦ y d e g ( x ) # G i ( x ) .
Let y ∈ | Y 0 |   be a Zariski closed point with d e g ( y ) | k   , let x ∈ | X 0 |   be a point above y   , and let φ y ∈ G a l ( k ( x ) / k ( y ) )   be the Frobenius substitution. Suppose g ∈ G d ( x )   and g − 1 ↦ φ y k d e g ( y )   under the canonical homomorphism G d ( x ) → G a l ( k ( x ) / k ( y ) )   . Then g F k ( x ) = x   and g F k   induces identity on k ( x )   . Conversely, if x   is a Zariski closed point in X 0   such that g F k ( x ) = x   and g F k   induces identity on k ( x )   , then g ∈ G d ( x )   , d e g ( y ) | k   , and g − 1 ↦ φ y k d e g ( y )   , where y   is the image of x   in Y 0   . On the other hand, there are exactly # G i ( x )   elements g   in G d ( x )   such that g − 1 ↦ φ y k d e g ( y )   . So we finally get
# Y 0 ( F q k ) = 1 # G ∑ y ∈ | Y 0 | , d e g ( y ) | k ∑ x ∈ | X 0 | , x ↦ y d e g ( x ) # G i ( x )
= 1 # G ∑ g ∈ G Λ ( g F k ) .
This proves Lemma 1.3.
Now we are ready to prove Theorem 0.1. By Lemmas 1.3 and 1.1, we have
# ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) = 1 # G ∑ g ∈ G Λ ( g F k )
= 1 # G ∑ g ∈ G ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) .
By Lemmas 1.1 and 1.2, T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )   and T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )   are algebraic integers, and T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ≡ T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ( m o d q k ) .   From now on, we work over the integral closure of p   -adic integers. Let o r d q ( # G ) = c   , a non-negative rational number. For each k ≥ c   , we have
# ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) = 1 # G ∑ g ∈ G ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )
≡ 1 # G ∑ g ∈ G ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ( m o d q k − c )
≡ ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ( m o d q k − c )
≡ # X 0 ( F q k ) ( m o d q k − c ) .
Let Z ( X 0 , T )   and Z ( X 0 , T )   be the zeta-functions of X 0   and X 0 / G   , respectively.
They are rational functions. Recall that we have
d d T log Z ( X 0 , T ) = ∑ k = 1 ∞ # X 0 ( F q k ) T k − 1 ,
d d T log Z ( X 0 / G , T ) = ∑ k = 1 ∞ # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) T k − 1 .
Take a factorization Z ( X 0 , T ) Z ( X 0 / G , T ) = m ∏ i = 1 ( 1 − α i T ) − n i , α i ≠ 0   where the α i   's are distinct and the n i   's are non-zero integers. Taking logarithmic derivative on both sides, we get ∑ k = 1 ∞ ( # X 0 ( F q k ) − # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) ) T k − 1 = ∑ i = 1 m n i α i 1 − α i T .   Using the congruence # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) ≡ # X 0 ( F q k ) ( m o d q k − c )   for all k ≥ c   , one deduces that the above power series is p   -adic analytic in the open disk o r d q ( T ) > − 1   . This implies that each α i   satisfies o r d q ( α i ) ≥ 1   , that is, each α i   is divisible by q   . We conclude that # X 0 ( F q k ) − # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) = ∑ i = 1 m n i α i k ≡ 0 ( m o d q k ) .   This finishes the proof of Theorem 0.1. Let's prove Theorem 0.4. By Ogus' generalization of Mazur's theorem ([BO] Theorem 8.39), the Newton polygon of the Frobenius correspondence F   on H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K   lies on or above the Hodge polygon of X 0   . For any i ≠ 0   , we have H i ( X 0 , O X 0 ) = 0   . So the slope of each line segment on the Newton polygon is at least 1   , that is, all the eigenvalues of F k   on H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K   are divisible by q k   (as p   -adic integers).
So we have T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ≡ 0 ( m o d q k )   for all i ≠ 0   . Since X 0   is geometrically connected, we have T r ( F k , H 0 ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) = 1 .   So by Lemma 1.1, we have
# X 0 ( F q k ) = ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )
≡ 1 ( m o d q k ) .
Now let G   be a finite group acting on the right of X 0   . For any g ∈ G   , since g   has finite order, the action of g   on H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K   is diagonalizable and all its eigenvalues are roots of unity. Combining with the fact that F   commutes with g   , we see that all the eigenvalues of g F k   on H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K   are also divisible by q k   for any i ≠ 0   . So we have T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ≡ T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ≡ 0 ( m o d q k )   for all i ≠ 0   . Since X 0   is geometrically connected, we have T r ( g F k , H 0 ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) = T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) = 1 .   Again let o r d q ( # G ) = c   . For each k ≥ c   , by Lemmas 1.1, 1.3, and the above discussion, we have
# ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) = 1 # G ∑ g ∈ G ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( g F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K )
≡ 1 # G ∑ g ∈ G ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ( m o d q k − c )
≡ ∑ i = 0 2 d i m X 0 ( − 1 ) i T r ( F k , H i ( X 0 / W ) ⊗ W K ) ( m o d q k − c )
≡ # X 0 ( F q k ) ( m o d q k − c ) .
As in the proof of Theorem 0.1, this implies that # ( X 0 / G ) ( F q k ) ≡ # X 0 ( F q k ) ( m o d q k ) .   This finishes the proof of Theorem 0.4.
References. [B] P. Berthelot, Cohomologie Cristalline des Schémas de Carastéristique p > 0   , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 407, Springer-Verlag 1974.
[BO] P. Berthelt and A. Ogus, Notes on Crystalline Cohomology, Princeton University Press 1978.
[D] P. Deligne, La Conjecture de Weil II, Publ. Math. IHES, 52 (1980), 137-252.
[E] H. Esnault, Deligne's Integrality Theorem in Unequal Characteristic and Rational Points over Finite Fields, Preprint. [KM] N. Katz and W. Messing, Some Consequences of the Riemann Hypothesis for Varieties over Finite Fields, Invent. Math. 23 (1974), 73-77. [M] B. Mazur, Frobenius and the Hodge Filtration (estimates), Ann. of Math. 98 (1973), 58-95.
[S] J.-P. Serre, Algebraic Groups and Class Fields, translation of the French edition, Springer-Verlag, 1988.
[SGA 1] A. Grothendieck, Revêtements Étales et Groupe Fondamental, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 224, Springer-Verlag (1971).
[W] D. Wan, Mirror Symmetry for Zeta Functions, arXiv:math.AG/0411464, 21 Nov 2004.