Splitting criterion for reflexive sheaves
TAKURO ABE
MASAHIKO YOSHINAGA
November 27, 2006
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study the structure of reflexive sheaves over projective spaces through hyperplane sections. We give a criterion for a reflexive sheaf to split into a direct sum of line bundles. An application to the theory of free hyperplane arrangements is also given.
0 Main Theorem
Vector bundles over the projective space
are one of the main subjects in both (algebraic) geometry and commutative algebra. The most fundamental result in this area is the theorem due to Grothendieck which asserts that any holomorphic vector bundle over
splits into a direct sum of line bundles.
When
, vector bundles over
do not necessarily split. Indeed, the tangent bundle is indecomposable. In these cases, some sufficient conditions for vector bundles to split have been established. The following is one of such criterions, which we call “Restriction criterion”.
Theorem 0.1 (Horrocks)
Let
be an algebraically closed field,
be an integer greater than or equal to 3, and let
be a locally free sheaf on
of
. Then
splits into a direct sum of line bundles if and only if there exists a hyperplane
such that
splits into a direct sum of line bundles.
In other words, the splitting of a vector bundle can be characterized by using a hyperplane section. However, vector bundles, or equivalently locally free sheaves, form a small class among all coherent sheaves. There are some important wider classes of coherent sheaves, e.g., reflexive sheaves or torsion free sheaves. The purpose of this article is to generalize the “Restriction criterion” to one for reflexive sheaves, and we also show that it fails in the class of torsion free sheaves. Our main theorem is as follows.
Theorem 0.2
Let
be an algebraically closed field,
be an integer greater than or equal to 3, and let
be a reflexive sheaf on
of
. Then
splits into a direct sum of line bundles if and only if there exists a hyperplane
such that
splits into a direct sum of line bundles.
We give two proofs for Theorem 0.2 . The first proof is basically parallel to that of Theorem 0.1 , in which we also establish a general principle that the structure of a reflexive sheaf can be recovered from its hyperplane section (Theorem 2.2 ).
The second proof is based on a cohomological characterization for a coherent sheaf to be locally free. By using it, the proof is reduced to Theorem 0.1 .
The organization of this paper is as follows. In § 1 , we recall some basic results on reflexive sheaves from [H2] . In § 2 , we give the first proof of the main theorem. In § 3 , we give the second proof by using a cohomological characterization for a coherent sheaf to be locally free.
To each hyperplane arrangement in a vector space, we can associate a reflexive sheaf over the projective space. The splitting of this reflexive sheaf defines an important class of arrangements, namely, free arrangements. As an application of our main theorem, we give a criterion for an arrangement to be free in § 4 , which has been also obtained in [Y] .
Acknowledgement. The authors learned results of § 3 from Professor F.-O. Schreyer. They are grateful to him. The authors also thank to Takeshi Abe and Florin Ambro for many helpful comments and pointing out mistakes in our draft. The second author was supported by the JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists.
1 Preliminaries
In this section, we fix the notation and prepare some results for the proof of Theorem 0.2 . We use the terms “vector bundle” and “locally free sheaf ” interchangeably. The term “variety” means a integral scheme of finite type over a field. Let
be a smooth variety of dimension
over a field
, where
and
is an algebraically closed field. For a coherent sheaf
on
we denote by
the non-free locus of
, i.e.,
. The dual of a coherent sheaf
(on
) is denoted by
.
In this article, we employ homological algebra to investigate properties of a coherent sheaf on a smooth variety
. Let us review some definitions and results. For a coherent sheaf
on
over
and for a point
(denoted by
as the length of a maximal
-regular sequence in
, where
is the unique maximal ideal of a local ring
. Moreover, we define the projective dimension of an
-module
(denoted by
as the length of a minimal free resolution of
as an
-module. It is known that every module which is finitely generated over a regular local ring has finite projective dimension. These two quantities are related by the famous Auslander-Buchsbaum formula as follows.
Hence it follows easily that a coherent sheaf
on
is locally free if and only if
for all
. For details and proofs, see [Ma] . The projective dimension can also be characterized as follows (for example, see [OSS] Chapter II).
Lemma 1.1
Let
be a smooth variety and
be a coherent sheaf on
.
Then
if and only if for all
we have
In particular,
is locally free if and only if
for all
.
Next, let us review definitions and results on reflexive sheaves on
.
Reflexive sheaves form a category between torsion free sheaves and vector bundles.
Definition 1.1
We say a coherent sheaf
on
is reflexive if the canonical morphism
is an isomorphism.
In this article, we use the following results on reflexive sheaves. For the proofs and details, see [H2] .
Proposition 1.2 ([H2] , Proposition 1.3)
A coherent sheaf
on
is reflexive if and only if
is torsion free and
for all points
such that
.
Corollary 1.3 ([H2] , Corollary 1.4)
for a reflexive sheaf
on
.
Proposition 1.4 ([H2] , Proposition 1.6)
For a coherent sheaf
on
, the following are equivalent.
-
1.
is reflexive.
-
2.
is torsion free and normal.
-
3.
is torsion free and for each open set
and each closed set
in
satistying
, we have
, where
is an open immersion.
2 The first proof of Theorem 0.2
Let us prove Theorem 0.2 . It suffices to show the “if ” part of the statement. First, let us assume that
. Then any hyperplane
intersects
. Take a point
. Note that
. Since the equation
which defines
at
is a regular element for the reflexive
-module
, it follows that
. From Auslander-Buchsbaum formula, we conclude that
can not even be locally free. Hence we may assume that
.
The next lemma is a generalization of Theorem 2.5 in [H2] .
Lemma 2.1
Let
be a reflexive sheaf on
(
) with
. Suppose the restriction
to a hyperplane
splits into a direct sum of line bundles. Then
Proof of Lemma 2.1 . We use the long exact sequence associated with the short exact sequence
Because
is a direct sum of line bundles, it follows that
. So we have surjections
|
(1)
|
To see that these cohomology groups are equal to zero, let us consider the spectral sequence of local and global Ext functors:
where
is the dualizing sheaf of
. The assumption
implies
for all
. Thus it follows that
unless
or
. Moreover, Proposition 1.2 implies
. From Auslander-Buchsbaum formula, we have
for all
. It follows that
for
. Hence we have
for
. Considering the convergence of this spectral sequence, we obtain the surjection
|
(2)
|
Since
is the Serre dual to
, they have the same dimension. From ( 2 ), we have
|
(3)
|
for all
. The right hand side of ( 3 ) vanishes for
. Then together with the surjectivity ( 1 ), we conclude that
.
Now, let us put
and
. Noting that
, Theorem 0.2 follows from the following theorem, which asserts that, roughly speaking, the structure of a reflexive sheaf can be recovered from its restriction to a hyperplane.
Theorem 2.2
Let
and
be reflexive sheaves on
and
be a hyperplane in
. Suppose
and
. Then
.
Proof of Theorem 2.2 . We want to extend the isomorphism
to one over
. That is possible since there is an exact sequence
| |
| |
and every morphism
has a canonical extension to a morphism
. Let us fix an extended morphism
which satisfies
. Now, let us consider the morphism
. This is a monomorphism because
is already a monomorphism. Since
, ranks and first Chern classes of
and
are the same. Henceforth we can see that
is a multiplication of some constant element in
. Note that this constant is not zero. For
is not zero on
. Thus at each point
, the morphism
is an isomorphism because at these points
are the endomorphism of a direct sum of local rings of the same rank. Since
and both of
and
are reflexive, the third condition of Proposition 1.4 implies that
is also an isomorphism on
.
Remark 2.1
In Theorem 0.2 , we can not omit the assumption that
is reflexive, i.e., “Restriction criterion” fails for torsion free sheaves. For example, consider the ideal sheaf
on
which corresponds to a closed point
. Note that
is not reflexive. Indeed, let us put
and
be an open immersion. It is easy to see that
.
If
is reflexive, then according to Proposition 1.4 ,
must hold.
However, clearly this is not ture. Hence
is not reflexive. Now, if we cut
by a plane
which does not contain
, then it is easily seen that
.
However, of course,
is not a line bundle on
.
3 The second proof
Instead of Theorem 2.2 , we can use the following result, which is the generalization of the famous Horrocks' splitting criterion (For example, see [OSS] ). Combining this criterion with usual cohomological arguments and Lemma 2.1 , we can give the second proof of Theorem 0.2 . However, it seems that this theorem is not so familiar. Hence let us show the result with a complete proof.
Theorem 3.1
Let
be an algebraically closed field,
be a integer greater than or equal to 2, and let
be a coherent sheaf on
. Then
splits into a direct sum of line bundles if and only if
for all
and
for all
.
Remark 3.1
Note that when
is torsion free, then
for all
. This follows from the fact that all torsion free sheaves can be embedded into a direct sum of line bundles on
. So in the theorem, the condition
is automatically satisfied for torsion free sheaves.
When
is a vector bundle, Theorem 3.1 is just the splitting criterion of Horrocks. Thus for the proof of this theorem, it suffices to show the following lemma.
Lemma 3.2
Let
be a nonsingular projective variety over an algebraically closed field
of dimension
,
be an ample line bundle on
, and let
be a coherent sheaf on
.Then
is locally free if and only if
for all
and
, where
.
Proof of Lemma 3.2 . From Serre duality, the “only if ” part follows immediately.
Let us show the “if ” part of the statement. Recall that
is locally free on
if and only if
for all
, see § 1 . Consider the spectral sequence
where
and
is the dualizing sheaf on
. By Serre duality,
for
. So for each
for sufficiently small
. Now let us assume that there exists an integer
such that
, and we show that this leads to a contradiction. It is easy to see that
On the other hand, for
,
From the definition of spectral sequence,
for
. This contradicts the assumption that for each
for sufficiently small
. Hence we can see that
for all
, so
is a locally free sheaf.
4 Application to hyperplane arrangements
In this section, we describe an application of our main theorem to the theory of hyperplane arrangements. As mentioned in § 0 , each hyperplane arrangement determines a reflexive sheaf. We start with a more general setting. To every divisor
in a complex manifold
we can associate a reflexive sheaf as follows.
Definition 4.1
A vector field
on an open set
is said to be logarithmic tangent to
if for a local defining equation
of
on
,
. The sheaf associated with logarithmic vector fields is denoted by
.
In the definition above, a vector field
is identified with a derivation
, and
can be considered as a subsheaf of the tangent sheaf. The sheaf of logarithmic vector fields
is not necessarily locally free, but in [S] , K. Saito proved the following.
Theorem 4.1 ([S] )
is a reflexive sheaf.
From now on, we restrict ourselves to the case where
is a hyperplane arrangement.
Let
be an
-dimensional linear space over
and
be the algebra of polynomial functions on
that is naturally isomorphic to
for any choice of basis
of
.
A (central) hyperplane arrangement
is a finite collection of codimension one linear subspaces in
. For each hyperplane
of
, fix a nonzero linear form
vanishing on
and put
.
The characteristic polynomial of
is defined as
where
is a lattice which consists of the intersections of elements of
, ordered by reverse inclusion,
is the unique minimal element of
and
is the Möbius function defined as follows:
| |
The characteristic polynomial is one of the most important concepts in the theory of hyperplane arrangements. Actually there are a lot of combinatorial or geometric interpretations of characteristic polynimial. For details, see [OT] .
Denote by
the
-module of all polynomial vector fields on
. The following definition was given by G. Ziegler.
Definition 4.2 ([Z] )
For a given arrangement
and a map
, we define modules of logarithmic vector fields with multiplicity
by
When the multiplicity
is the constant map
,
is simply denoted by
.
It is known that the graded
-module
is a reflexive module of rank
.
Definition 4.3
-
(1)
An arrangement with a multiplicity
is called free with exponents
if
is a free
-module, with a homogeneous basis
such that
Note that a vector field
is said to be homogeneous if coefficients
are all homogeneous with the same degree and put
.
-
(2)
An arrangement
is called free if
is free, i.e.,
is a free
-module.
Since
contains the Euler vector field
, the exponents
of a free arrangement
contains
. H. Terao proved that the freeness of
implies a remarkable behavior of the characteristic polynomial.
Theorem 4.2 ([T] )
Suppose
is a free arrangement with the exponents
, then
As we will see later, in Corollary 4.5 , the freeness is equivalent to the splitting of a reflexive sheaf, and exponents are corresponding to the splitting type. On the other hand, the left hand side of the Theorem 4.2 is obtained from the intersection poset, thus determined by the combinatorial structure.
This theorem connects two regions in mathematics: combinatorics of arrangements and geometry of reflexive sheaves. It enables us to study combinatorics of arrangements via a geometric method. For example, in [Y] characteristic polynomials for some arrangements are computed by using this interpretation.
In [Z] , Ziegler studied the relation between the freeness and the freeness with a multiplicity. Fixing a hyperplane
, let us define an arrangement
over
and the natural multiplicity
for
.
Theorem 4.3 ([Z] )
If
is a free arrangement with exponents
, then the restricted arrangement with natural multiplicity
is also free with exponents
.
More precisely, let
be a defining equation of
and define
It is easily seen that
has a direct sum decomposition into graded
-modules
Ziegler proved that if
is a basis of
with
, then
form a basis of
.
Recall that a graded
-module
determines a coherent sheaf
over
. Conversely for any coherent sheaf
over
,
defines the graded
-module associated with
. We have the natural
-homomorphism
, which is neither injective nor surjective in general. In the case of
, however, we have the following lemma.
Lemma 4.4
is isomorphic.
Proof of Lemma 4.4 . We prove the surjectivity. Since
, any element in
can be expressed as
where
. From the facts that
is an element of a
-free module
and
is UFD, it is easily seen that
is also a polynomial vector field, so contained in
. Let
be a defining linear form of
, and we may choose
such that
and
are linearly independent. Then the right hand side of
is divisible by
, so is the left. Hence
is also divisible by
, and we can conclude that
.
The above lemma enable us to connect freeness and splitting.
Corollary 4.5
is free with exponents
if and only if
Now, the following theorem, which has been proved and played an important role in the proof of Edelman and Reiner conjecture in [Y] , is naturally proved from Theorem 0.2 .
Theorem 4.6 ([Y] )
is free if and only if there exists a hyperplane
such that
-
(a)
is free, and
-
(b)
is free for all
.
Proof of Theorem 4.6 . Let us denote by
the projective space of one-dimensional subspaces in a vector space
. Recall that
is a graded reflexive
-module. So it determines a reflexive sheaf
over
. As is mentioned in [MS] , the local structure of
is determined by the local structure of
, i.e.,
for
. Using Theorem 4.3 locally, condition (b) in Theorem 4.6 implies that
Now condition (a) in Theorem 4.3 means that
splits into a direct sum of line bundles. From Theorem 0.2 , we may conclude that
is also splitting. Hence
is a free module over
. Thus
is a free arrangement.
References
-
D. Eisenbud, G. Floystad, F.-O. Schreyer, Sheaf cohomology and free resolutions over exterior algebra. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 355 (2003), 4397-4426.
-
R. Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry. Graduated Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 1977.
-
R. Hartshorne, Stable reflexive sheaves. Math. Ann. 254 (1980), 121-176.
-
H. Matsumura, Commutative Algebra. W.A. Benjamin Co., New York (1970).
-
M. Mustaţ ǎ and H. Schenck, The module of logarithmic
-forms of a locally free arrangement. J. Algebra 241 (2001), no. 2, 699–719.
-
C. Okonek, M. Schneider, H. Spindler, Vector Bundles on Complex Projective Spaces. 3 (1980), Birkhäuser.
-
P. Orlik, H. Terao, Arrangements of hyperplanes. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 300. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.
-
K. Saito, Theory of logarithmic differential forms and logarithmic vector fields. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math.27 (1980), no. 2, 265–291
-
H. Terao, Generalized exponents of a free arrangement of hyperplanes and Shepherd-Todd-Brieskorn formula. Invent. Math. 63 (1981), no. 1, 159–179.
-
M. Yoshinaga, Characterization of a free arrangement and conjecture of Edelman and Reiner. Invent. Math. 157(2004), no.2, 449–454.
-
G. M. Ziegler, Multiarrangements of hyperplanes and their freeness. in Singularities (Iowa City, IA, 1986), pp. 345–359, Contemp. Math., 90, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1989.
Takuro Abe Department of Mathematics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan, abetaku@math.kyoto-u.ac.jp Masahiko Yoshinaga Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan yosinaga@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp