1  

On toric varieties of high arithmetical rank

Margherita Barile † † Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research. Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Bari,Via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy

November 27, 2006

Abstract
We describe a class of toric varieties in the N   -dimensional affine space which are minimally defined by N 2   binomial equations.
Introduction The arithmetical rank (ara) of an algebraic variety is the minimum number of equations that are needed to define it set-theoretically. For every affine variety V K N   we have that codim V   ara V N   . This general upper bound was found by Eisenbud and Evans [7. In particular cases a better upper bound can be obtained by direct computations based on Hilbert's Nullstellensatz: this was done for certain toric varieties in [1, [2, [3, [4, [5. In all the examples treated there the arithmetical rank was close to the trivial lower bound, i.e., ara V   codim V + 1   . In this paper we present a class of toric varieties whose arithmetical rank is close to the general upper bound, namely ara V = N 2   . For proving this result, of course, we need a more efficient lower bound:
this is provided by étale cohomology. The same kind of tools was used in [3.
There they were applied for showing that the arithmetical rank of certain toric varieties of codimension 2 depends on the characteristic of the ground field, and that ara V =   codim V   in exactly one positive characteristic. In the present paper, however, we study toric varieties of any codimension, and obtain the same arithmetical rank in all characteristics.

1 The main theorem

Let K   be an algebraically closed field, and let n 2   be an integer. Let e 1 , . . . , e n   be the standard basis of Z Z n   . Set N = 2 n 1   and consider the following subset of I N N   :
T = { e 1 , . . . , e n 1 , d e n , a 1 e 1 + e n , . . . , a n 1 e n 1 + e n } ,   where d , a 1 , . . . , a n 1 I N *   . We also suppose that d   is divisible by two distinct primes p   and q   . With T   we can associate the variety V   admitting the following parametrization V : { x 1 = u 1 . . . x n 1 = u n 1 x n = u n d y 1 = u 1 a 1 u n . . . y n 1 = u n 1 a n 1 u n ,   which is a toric variety of codimension n 1   in the affine space K N   . Our aim is to show the following
Theorem 1 ara V = N 2   .
This will be accomplished in two steps.

2 The defining equations

We show that ara V N 2   by exhibiting N 2   binomials which define V   set-theoretically.
Proposition 1 The variety V   is set-theoretically defined by the following binomials:
F i = y i d x i a i d x n for i = 1 , . . . , n 1
G i = y i d 1 y i + 1 x i a i ( d 1 ) x i + 1 a i + 1 x n for i = 1 , . . . , n 2
Proof .It is straightforward to check that for all w V   , F i ( w ) = 0   and G i ( w ) = 0   for all indices i   . Conversely, we have to prove that for every w K N   such that
F i ( w ) = 0 for i = 1 , . . . , n 1 (1)
G i ( w ) = 0 for i = 1 , . . . , n 2 (2)
we have that w W   . Let w = ( x ¯ 1 , . . . , x ¯ n , y ¯ 1 , . . . , y ¯ n 1 ) K N   be a point fulfilling ( 1 ) and ( 2 ). We show that, for a suitable choice of parameters u 1 , . . . , u n   , w = ( u 1 , . . . , u n 1 , u n d , u 1 a 1 u n , . . . , u n 1 a n 1 u n )   . This is certainly true if x ¯ n = 0   : in this case ( 1 ) implies that y ¯ i = 0   for i = 1 , . . . , n 1   , and we can take u i = x ¯ i   for all i = 1 , . . . , n 1   . Suppose that x ¯ n 0   . Then, by ( 1 ), for all i = 1 , . . . , n 1   , we have x ¯ i = 0   if and only if y ¯ i = 0   . If n = 2   and x ¯ 1 = 0   , then take u 1 = 0   and set u 2   equal to any d   -th root of x ¯ 2   . Otherwise, up to replacing n   with a smaller number, we may assume that x ¯ i 0   for all i = 1 , . . . , n 1   .
Set u i = x ¯ i   for all i = 1 , . . . , n 1   and let u n   be a d   -th root of x ¯ n   . By ( 1 ) we have that, for all i = 1 , . . . , n 1   , y ¯ i d = u i a i d u n d ,   which implies that
y ¯ i = u i a i u n ω i (3)
for some d   -th root ω i   of 1. On the other hand, from ( 2 ) we deduce that
y ¯ i d 1 y ¯ i + 1 = u i a i ( d 1 ) u i + 1 a i + 1 u n d (4)
Replacing ( 3 ) on the left-hand side of ( 4 ) gives
u i a i ( d 1 ) u n d 1 ω i d 1 u i + 1 a i + 1 u n ω i + 1 = u i a i ( d 1 ) u i + 1 a i + 1 u n d , (5)
and finally, being u i , u i + 1 , u n   non zero, we have that, for all i = 1 , . . . , n 2   ,
ω i d 1 ω i + 1 = 1 . (6)
This implies that ω i = ω i + 1   for all i = 1 , . . . , n 2   , i.e., ω 1 , . . . , ω n 1   are all equal to the same d   -th root ω   of 1. Set u n = ω u n   . Then x ¯ n = u n d   and, by ( 3 ), y ¯ i = u i a i u n   for i = 1 , . . . , n 1   .
Hence u 1 , . . . , u n 1 , u n   is the required set of parameters.

3 The lower bound

We show that ara V N 2   by means of the following criterion, which is based on étale cohomology and is cited from [6, Lemma 3   .
Lemma 1 Let W W ~   be affine varieties. Let d = dim W ~ \ W   . If there are s   equations F 1 , . . . , F s   such that W = W ~ V ( F 1 , . . . , F s )   , then H d + i e t ( W ~ \ W , Z Z / r Z Z ) = 0 for all i s   and for all r Z Z   which are prime to char K   .
Hence our claim will follow once we have shown
Proposition 2 If char K p   , then H 2 N 3 e t ( K N \ V , Z Z / p Z Z ) 0 .   If char K q   , then H 2 N 3 e t ( K N \ V , Z Z / q Z Z ) 0 .  
Proof .Let r { p , q }   , and suppose that char K r   . In the sequel H e t   and H c   will denote étale cohomology and étale cohomology with compact support with respect to the coefficient group Z Z / r Z Z   : we shall omit the latter for the sake of simplicity. By Poincaré Duality (s. [8, Cor. 11.2, p. 276) we have
H 2 N 3 e t ( K N \ V ) H 3 c ( K N \ V ) (7)
Moreover, we have a long exact sequence of cohomology with compact support H 2 c ( K N ) H 2 c ( V ) H 3 c ( K N \ V ) H 3 c ( K N ) ,   where H 2 c ( K N ) = H 3 c ( K N ) = 0   , since N 3   . Hence
H 3 c ( K N \ V ) H 2 c ( V ) (8)
By ( 7 ) and ( 8 ) it thus suffices to show that
H 2 c ( V ) 0 (9)
On K n   fix the coordinates u 1 , . . . , u n   and let X   be the subvariety of K n   defined by u 1 = u 2 = = u n 1 = 0   . Then X   is a 1-dimensional affine space over K   , on which we fix the coordinate u n   . Consider the surjective map φ : K n V   ( u 1 , . . . , u n ) ( u 1 , . . . , u n 1 , u n d , u 1 a 1 u n , . . . , u n 1 a n 1 u n )   and the restriction map φ ~ : K n \ X V \ φ ( X ) ,   which is a bijective morphism of affine schemes. For all i = 1 , . . . , n 1   let V i = { ( x ¯ 1 , . . . , x ¯ n 1 , x ¯ n , y ¯ 1 , . . . , y ¯ n 1 ) V | x ¯ i 0 }   . These sets form an open cover of V \ φ ( X )   , and U i = φ 1 ( V i ) = { ( u 1 , . . . , u n ) K n | u i 0 }   . Moreover, for all i = 1 . . . , n 1   , the morphism ψ i : V i U i   ( x ¯ 1 , . . . , x ¯ n 1 , x ¯ n , y ¯ 1 , . . . , y ¯ n 1 ) ( x ¯ 1 , . . . , x ¯ n 1 , y ¯ i x ¯ i a i )   is the inverse map of the restriction of φ ~   to U i   . Hence φ ~   is an isomorphism of affine schemes, so that it induces an isomorphism of groups φ ~ i * : H i c ( V \ φ ( X ) ) H i c ( K n \ X )   for all indices i   . The restriction of φ   to X   φ ¯ : X φ ( X )   maps u n   to ( 0 , . . . , 0 , u n d , . . . , 0 )   . Hence φ ( X )   is a 1-dimensional affine space and φ ¯   induces multiplication by d   in cohomology with compact support. Now, as it is well-known, H i c ( φ ( X ) ) H i c ( X ) { Z Z / r Z Z for i = 2 0 else   Since r   divides d   , it follows that the induced maps φ ¯ i * : H i c ( φ ( X ) ) H i c ( X )   are all equal to the zero map. Thus φ   gives rise to the following morphism of acyclic complexes:
Z Z / r Z Z
| f
H 2 c ( V ) H 2 c ( φ ( X ) ) H 3 c ( V \ φ ( X ) )
φ ¯ 2 * 0 | φ ~ 3 *
H 2 c ( K n ) H 2 c ( X ) H 3 c ( K n \ X )
| g
Z Z / r Z Z
Note that φ ~ 3 * f = g 0 = 0   is the zero map, so that φ ~ 3 * f   is not injective. Since φ ~ 3 *   is an isomorphism, it follows that f   is not injective. This implies ( 9 ) and completes the proof. References

  1. M. Barile, Almost set-theoretic complete intersections in characteristic zero. Preprint (2005). arXiv:math.AG/0504052
  2. M. Barile, A note on Veronese varieties. Preprint (2005). arXiv:math.AG/0504055
  3. M. Barile, G. Lyubeznik, Set-theoretic complete intersections in characteristic p   . Preprint (2004). To appear in: Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society.
  4. M. Barile, M. Morales, A. Thoma, On Simplicial Toric Varieties Which Are Set-Theoretic Complete Intersections, J. Algebra 226 (2000), 880–892.
  5. M. Barile, M. Morales, A. Thoma, Set-Theoretic Complete Intersections on Binomials, Proc. AMS 130 (2002), 1893–1903.
  6. W. Bruns, R. Schwänzl, The number of equations defining a determinantal variety, Bull. London Math. Soc. 22 (1990), 439–445.
  7. D. Eisenbud, E.G. Evans, jr. Every Algebraic Set in n   -Space is the Intersection of n   Hypersurfaces, Inv. Math. 19 (1973), 107–112.
  8. J.S. Milne, “Étale cohomology”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1980.